Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: New Lens Patent 70-300 F4.5-5.6 with In-lens SR

Sunday, June 07, 2020

New Lens Patent 70-300 F4.5-5.6 with In-lens SR


https://ipforce.jp/patent-jp-A-2020-86357
(in Japanese)

A few key highlights are as follows (Google Translated):

[Name or name] Ricoh Co., Ltd.

[0008]
However, in the zoom lens system of Patent Document 1, since the second lens group 2b, which is the image blur correction lens group, is close to the stop on the long focal length end side (tele end side), the long focal length end side (tele end is set at the time of image blur correction). The eccentric coma aberration generated on the side) tends to be large. Therefore, the second b group, which is the image blur correction lens group, is composed of three or more lenses, and there remains a problem in weight reduction of the image blur correction lens group.

(Table 5)
Short focal length end Medium focal length Long focal length end
Focal length 72.2 135.0 293.2

F number 4.43 4.88 5.34

(Table 8)
Short focal length end Medium focal length Long focal length end
Focal length 72.0 135.1 293.6

F number 4.59 4.96 5.52

A list of variants of the same design gene are patented. While the focal ranges are almost the same, the maximum apertures could vary a bit but the variations are insignificant.

Comments (2)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
So it looks like, Ricoh will have a hard time to tell the Pentaxians: Yes, now in this patent, we finally confess that optical stabilization is the better solution? ;) Actually at least for tele it is, so this makes sense here actually, so why not. However, this raises some suspicion. Did Ricoh "take" someone else's design as a starting point, i.e. one which is for optical stabilization, and then they tweaked that design a little to circumvent patent clashes?
1 reply · active 248 weeks ago
Ricoh Imaging used in-lens optical stabilization, in two Pentax D FA645 lenses. There's no need to "take" (whatever that means) someone else's design, just like they didn't "take" the in-body stabilization but instead developed their own.

Post a new comment

Comments by