Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: SDMs DO Require Preventive Maintenance!

Monday, January 29, 2024

SDMs DO Require Preventive Maintenance!

Owing to the prolonged infamous failure of the SDMs in various Pentax AF lens models, I only bought my first SDM lens, the DA*55 F1.4, back to 2015, which is a SDM-only lens in KAF3 mount (on screw-drive). After that, I bought also another SDM only lens the DA17-70 and then later a DA*60-250 F4 hybrid-SDM/screw-driven lens (which supports also in 2022.

Here is my proven experiences with those SDM lenses and my tip to prevent them from malfunction before it would be too late, as follows:

I observe that all those lenses did require regular use of the motors. If they were left un-use for a period of time, the AF motors would first become difficult to move. In that case, first of all they were moving rather slowly and with some clicks of odd sound coming out when moving, rather not smoothly. So, more exercise with the lenses could improve thing. After they had (been) moved smoothly, then it would work flawlessly for a couple of months again. This first happened with my DA*55 of which the first SDM  problem appeared after about one year of purchase of the lens. (I bought that lens from the Biccamera in Japan brand new.)

Same thing happened with my DA*60-250 but the symptom exhibited, which was even worse. This lens was bought from the Amazon.jp brand new and was manufactured in 2021 as shown in the document in box, which was supposed to be of the rumoured "newly designed" SDM, but which IMHO has actually been non-existent. Eventually, I needed to bring out my old screw-driven AF Pentax DSLR to turn and smooth out the operation of the SDM, which is rather hilarious indeed. After that, the SDM turnsed flawlessly, i.e. quick and smooth, but only after my prevent maintenance work carried out for about ten minute, and turnings of both the SDM and the screw-drive mechanics were required.

Another observation of mine is that the SDMs would slow down in cold weather when the temperature was cold. Hence, despite the "cold-proof" specification and feature of those AW SDM lenses, those lenses equipped with SDMs are in fact vulnerable to cold weather and to work properly under low temperatures unless they do enough "exercises" from day to day.

So, if you have those evil Pentax SDM lenses, do remember to mark your calendar and carry out periodical PMs before they are to die, which will be too late to save by then. My humble advice and true experience shared.

Comments (9)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Anime Gee's avatar

Anime Gee · 60 weeks ago

This is why I refuse to buy any of the older DA* lenses, even used. Will Ricoh ever rework them? Who knows, but I have a feeling that there's a bigger possibility that they won't
1 reply · active 60 weeks ago
They have re-worked the new in-lens AF motors as the PLM for new lens models. However, many of the old DA* lenses are indeed optically excellent, e.g. the DA*300 F4 lens, but that SDM inside usually sucks.
Can you please name which camera would be good to use for the "exercise"? Would film MZ-3 be OK as well? Thanks much!
1 reply · active 43 weeks ago
I usually use my K-3 III and K-1 to do it, used to mount my SDM lenses on my KP but now is somehow replaced by my K-3 III.
Thank you Michael. My assumption from your article was you must use a camera what doesn't recognize SDM but has only the old Power Zoom function or with no two contacts. So just turning off SDM on lens and body with screw drive is needed than. Pentax forum person claims only bodies with bigger D-Li90 work to exercise SDM which KP doesn't have without the battery grip. Did you use the grip and D-Li90 with KP? Thanks again!
3 replies · active 39 weeks ago
I used Pentax bodies that support SDMs to move the motors when they had just started to be somehow unresponsive or moving slower, but that the SDM motors of my lenses had not yet died. I did also use my KP to do the above job, without any problem.
Have just 2 SDM and doing OK (50-135 and 60-250). They'll be "exercised" as needed and thank you for the reminder what was semi known but maybe somewhat forgotten!

Is Ricoh trying to finish Pentax off with latest pre-release "Pentax 17", a 40 years old style film compact ? There are millions of likes what not many want, besides collectors. Confusing decision in 2024.
If the 17 had an aided manual focusing system, I should buy it.
Another big issue, regardless any features, is developing a color films. No locations offer film processing anymore in my extended area, so it leaves it to B&W in "home lab" like a main stream users 60+ years ago or mail rolls out. Hope it offers what you want. I'm using on rare occasion 645 B&W setup and 35mm (LX & MV1) when nostalgia storm kicks in.

Post a new comment

Comments by