Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: Major Differences between K-1 and the Mark II

Saturday, February 24, 2018

Major Differences between K-1 and the Mark II



K-1
K-1 II
What's New
Max. ISO
102400 (204800)
819200
PRIME IV with Accelerator Unit
Bluetooth Support
No
Yes
Image Sync 2.0
Pixel Shift Resolution
Tripod
Handheld Possible
Max. Burst (APS-C, JPEG)
6.5 fps
6.4 fps
Battery Life (CIPA)
760
670
AF Performance
-
Improved
New AF Algorithm
Time (UTC +0800):
標籤： , , , , , , ,

Comments (6)

Loading... Logging you in...
Dashboard | Edit profile | Logout
  • Logged in as
0 Vote up Vote down
Zapp's avatar

Zapp · 369 weeks ago

Improved noise reduction - not just higher ISO
Worth 500€ for the upgrade?, most likely!
Loading...
+1 Vote up Vote down
tttempelorg's avatar - Go to profile

tttempelorg 2p · 369 weeks ago

But does the internal NR do something that taking RAW images and post processing them on a PC can't? (RAW does not include any NR pre-processing, I believe)

In other words, will the Mk II's sensor be more sensitive to low light even with RAW images?
1 reply · active 369 weeks ago
+1 Vote up Vote down
Zos Xavius's avatar

Zos Xavius · 369 weeks ago

Yes. The KP shows that whatever they are doing with the accelerator chip is worthwhile and it is outperforming the K-70 significantly.
0 Vote up Vote down
6x7's avatar

6x7 · 369 weeks ago

"Raw" is already noise reduction preprocessed.
1 reply · active 369 weeks ago
0 Vote up Vote down
Zos Xavius's avatar

Zos Xavius · 369 weeks ago

Yes at multiple points too. On chip and then on the imaging processor when it hits that stage.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)