Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: 550D + 17-40L/4 Vs K-x + 16-45/4 & ISO Shootout

Thursday, June 10, 2010

550D + 17-40L/4 Vs K-x + 16-45/4 & ISO Shootout



Long Time No Measurbation! It's time to do it again! ;-D

Test Conditions:-

1. Light Source and Environment: Diffused Daylight Indoor; Bright Cloudy Outside; Cameras on Sturdy Tripod.

2. 550D Settings: Av Exposure Mode at f/8, Evaluative Metering, No Exposure Compensation, AWB, Single Central Point One-Shot AF, Large Fine JPEG, "Standard" Picture Style with Default Parameters (Factory Default), 2 sec. Self-Timer with Mirror Lock (Set Separately in Custom Function), Lens Peripheral Illumination Correction Off, Auto Lighting Optimizer Off, High ISO Noise Reduction Low, Lens at 40mm. All EXIF Data Preserved.

3. K-x Settings: Av Exposure Mode at f/8, Evaluative Metering, No Exposure Compensation, AWB, Single Central Point Single AF, Large Fine JPEG, "Bright" Picture Style with Default Parameters (Factory Default), 2 sec. Self-Timer with Mirror Lock, Lens Distortion and CA Correction Off, High ISO Noise Reduction Low (Starting from ISO400, Set in Custom Function), Lens at 45mm. All EXIF Data Preserved.

4. Uploaded samples are resized to 4,000 pixels in width and in the same size, for easy and meaningful comparisons. Click on any of the thumbnails to Download and Enlarge.

Okay, let's go!

ISO
550D + EF 17-40L F4 @ 40mm & f/8
K-x + DA 16-45 F4 @ 45mm & f/8
100

200
400
800
1600
3200
6400

Some of My Quick Findings..

1. The overall colour tone of the K-x pics is slightly warmer, which is closer to what my eyes could see.

2. However, the 550D combo do have slightly better colour accuracy of which the colours re-produced are yet a bit closer and more faithful to the original colours. Do note that the Colour Modes chosen for both cameras are Factory Default ones which are somehow ex-exaggerated in colours as designed and intended.

3. At the same ISO speeds, the 550D pics have more colour noise in shadows whereas the K-x pics have more visible luminance noise in shadows.

4. 550D pictures do have slight edge in resolution when viewed in full and at pixel level, even up to ISO 800. However, if the two sets of pictures are resized down to at about 10+ Megapixels, the difference would not be so noticeable.

Btw, above are just my own quick observations and findings. If you don't fully agree with me, your take now! (and you're feel to do so! It's so easy! :-))


Read Also:-

Summary Matrix for Equipment Tests and Reviews

Comments (12)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Comparing shots at ISO3200, it seems that the K-x shows more detail in the texture of the fabrics (a noticeable amount but not significant), although the noise is a touch more obvious. Due to a little stronger noise-removal in the Canon? (Despite both being "Low")

Why not set the 16-45mm to 40mm for a closer comparison?
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Canon's multiplying factor is 1.6x, whilst Pentax' is about 1.5x. So, they should be close enough.

Do note that normally I test lenses at their marked focals, but not somewhere in between.
I think ISO perfomance very close, but 550 have better noise structure IMO)
Interesting comparison!

I prefer the texture from the Pentax.

I'm sure I would prefer the AF from the Canon though! I swore at my K-x a couple of times today when trying to photograph black kites...
Daddy Puff's avatar

Daddy Puff · 772 weeks ago

Rice, you just compare in-camera JPEG of camera. For RAW-shooters are useless.

Do you know UFRAW and GIMP? Use it without any NR with default settings and we will see the real NOISE of cameras.
5 replies · active 772 weeks ago
I used the GIMP back to the *ist D days, so?

Do note that I am comparing cameras' performance as a package by different makes, but not to compare different software and raw converters, see?
Daddy Puff's avatar

Daddy Puff · 772 weeks ago

UFRAW/DCRAW shows the naked data without any noise reduction and in-software's built-in effects.
The final JPEG/TIFF from DCRAW is real IQ of camera without any noise-reduction.
You're right if you want to compare software for different cameras, but not hardware and packages.
Daddy Puff's avatar

Daddy Puff · 772 weeks ago

Rice, do you understand what DCRAW is??? I see you understand nothing.
Hardware? Who cares?
People who don't play with raw files. I know there are many of them in the world .. and that's what RH shows, what'll you'll get streight from the camera.
The 550D is just 50% more expensive...
So, I think that what this effectively demonstrates is that in your particular setup, image quality isn't an interesting point of distinction between these two camera / lens combos. ('Course, one combo is around $1500 new, while the other is $900.)

Post a new comment

Comments by