• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Wednesday, June 02, 2010
Pentax K-7 Vs Canon 7D AF Speed Test
(URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngUcQUchHEU)
Well, I think the test video speaks clearly itself. As such, I have no more to say!
Last Related Article:-
For Those Who Think the DA 17-70 is the Fastest SDM Lens in AF..
標籤:
K-7,
Lenses,
Other Bodies,
Reviews,
SDM,
System Performance
Comments (15)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
Pentax K-7 Vs Canon 7D AF Speed Test
2010-06-02T08:28:00+08:00
RiceHigh
K-7|Lenses|Other Bodies|Reviews|SDM|System Performance|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
DronDrive · 774 weeks ago
Enche Tjin · 774 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 774 weeks ago
David · 773 weeks ago
Putting this up shows how much you are in the bag for Canon, RiceHigh
Dave · 773 weeks ago
Daddy Puff · 773 weeks ago
They compare 18-250 with 18-55? Nonsense. Put DA*16-50 to K-7 and compare with 17-55/2.8 with 7D. If you want real AF speed test,
put the same Sigma to both camera and compare.
Absolutely rubbish test. Nothing to discuss.
RiceHigh 110p · 773 weeks ago
Daddy Puff · 773 weeks ago
It's just homebrew quick comparision. And nothing else.
David · 773 weeks ago
Use 50mm 1.4 from both companies. I have no problem testing similar-sized lenses from each company. Comparing a 70-200 to a 16-50 lens is not fair - they are different models with completely different goals (the 16-50 is meant to be quiet). Quite frankly, I would rather see the old FA* 80-200 compared to the new Canon in a focusing test - at least they are similar in size and quality.
Rice you said the video speaks for itself.....it says that a Canon fanboi, probably self-conscious of the speed of Nikon cameras, rigged a test to 'show' how well a Canon does against a Pentax. He doesn't show us the viewfinder view, letting us see if it in fact was focused. Is it on constant focus, or for single shot, which does change things
Daddy Puff · 773 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 773 weeks ago
Orgya · 773 weeks ago
David · 773 weeks ago
orly_andico · 742 weeks ago
(I had just gotten the 40D and macro lens, both used)
Testing was on a tripod, focusing on something at the minimum focusing distance. I rotated each lens to infinity before each test.
The Canon macro has a much shorter focusing throw, and the ring-drive ultrasonic motor is also faster. But not THAT much faster (certainly not 2X faster).
The real difference I believe in perceived "better" Canon AF performance is that it rarely hunts, even in fairly low light (and the 40D is 2-3 generations old already). Pentax has this "focus confirmation stutter" which delays the shot by a huge amount of time, up to 2-3 seconds while the shutter is locked, unless in AF-C mode.
However.. I cannot say the Canon AF is more accurate. But, the 40D is a 10MP camera and the K20D is 15MP, but it seems that the K20D images (with D-FA 100mm) are sharper than those from the 40D + 100mm Macro Ultrasonic.
Someone advised me to use AF-C so that the shutter is not locked until focus is achieved. This provides near-Canon level AF "decisiveness" but.. a lot of out-of-focus shots (much more than the Canon, even with the Canon's over-optimistic in-focus indication).
Pasang Cctv Di Solo · 465 weeks ago