A K-5IIs user complained about his new K-5IIs body had an air leakage problem which is demonstrated in the following YouTube video that he uploaded:-
(http://youtu.be/1WFT5sQinlo)
He hence requested for a replacement unit. After the replacement unit arrived, he did the following comparison test:-
(http://youtu.be/6qt4FmiP8vI)
Via: Post @ Pentax Fans Club (Taiwan)
Wow, what a difference and what a QC! Pentax just built and marketed a supposedly sealed-model which is actually not completely sealed! :-o After this incident, I think Pentax should add a toilet paper test in their QC line for what this end-user has done, so as to check if the sealing of their cameras is proper, frankly!
• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Comments (16)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
The Large Air Blower Model K-5IIs! :-o
2012-12-12T12:58:00+08:00
RiceHigh
Issues|K-5II/s|Lenses|Quality Issues|System Reliability|Videos|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Alex · 639 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 639 weeks ago
Alex · 639 weeks ago
Think about it: the lens' internal volume is changing; air MUST get in and out, otherwise you'll get a nice pressure difference which will make zooming in or out impossible.
By the way, in both videos the paper is moving... what difference?
RiceHigh 110p · 639 weeks ago
Alex · 639 weeks ago
I can see that nothing is controlled in the "test", no effort was made to even localize the air flow.
So, while I definitely can't rule out e.g. a gap in the LCD's sealing, I'd say I also can't be sure this is actually the case. Who knows, maybe the sealing on the first camera's lens is too tight and it partially forces the air out through the camera's sealing.
Leschi · 639 weeks ago
I think important is, that no dirt or water comes in the body. What's coming out doesn't matter.
guest · 639 weeks ago
Alex · 639 weeks ago
If there is indeed a gap in the sealing, I definitely don't want that. But I wouldn't want an airtight camera, either... huge, heavy, expensive and cumbersome.
djezek · 639 weeks ago
djezek · 639 weeks ago
Wider · 639 weeks ago
And K-5 is weather-proof camera, not hermetic camera.
zosX · 639 weeks ago
communism ghost · 639 weeks ago
But I have near at hand only my K-5 of the first version.
By the way!
On video to us don't show that part of the camera with which air but only the opposite proceeds.
The part necessary to us is hidden. From that party there is "allegedly, an air blowing" outside.
Pay attention to an important point: on one video, paper doesn't react to air "suction".
Really, has to! Time air leaves "through an opening", means has to through it and enter.
But on video, paper doesn't react to absorption of air in any way, it doesn't occur!
Here it is possible to assume thought that somewhere on the back panel
K-5 II has to be the valve which is pumping over air only in one party.
And what is from that party of the camera, on the back panel?
The screen, at the top of 2 buttons, further sideways cut with a rubber slip.
I tried to blow air lips of the K-5 serially: at first via 2 buttons,
then through a rubber cap, and, at last via the screen. It isn't blown. In any way. Doesn't climb even under
stronger pressure, than it is represented on video. Then - inside the valve? ;-)
communism ghost · 639 weeks ago
Alex · 639 weeks ago
However, the author says the air goes through the viewfinder... but was the test precise enough to indicate it is indeed so?
communism ghost · 638 weeks ago