Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: My K-1 Impressions (Pure Text Quick Review)

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

My K-1 Impressions (Pure Text Quick Review)

The ergonomics of the K-1 is superb. It feels very comfortable to hold in hands and feels very solid and balanced. The overall build of the K-1 is very good, but the camera top feels a bit plasticky and hollow.

AF is really accurate, but hit rate is not 100%, sometime it missed, especially when focusing in a hurry or under low light. But when it hits, it is really accurate. Tried the three FA Limited wide opened, no problem. Tried several other A, FA, FA*, DA and DA* primes, they all focused accurately wide opened. The K-1 probably is the most accurate Pentax AFSLR ever made, since the MZ-S. I really like it! :-)

Focusing is faster and quieter than before. But the speed is not particularly fast when it is compared to other FF bodies of Canon and Nikon. Forget about focus tracking with multiple AF points for moving objects, the points are still not enough and are too much centred. There is still some room for improvement. 

Exposure accuracy is good, probably maybe a bit bright for its tendency, especially with film glass. Seems a bit more accurate with digital lenses. Nonetheless, the EV compensation is always there. It is quite easy to use with the quick function dial. I set it to +/- by default. Or, one can customise the e-dials to directly control the EV compensation.

Resolution of the images from K-1 is really superb. The per pixel sharpness is better than the Canon and Sony FF bodies that I have, even with the same lenses put on them. That's only my own subjective impression, though and no scientific measurbation has yet been made, because I am now busy with shooting with a good camera, instead of doing endless measurbation tests for faulty cameras.

Colour rendition is contemporary, which is now very Canon alike. It do taste very CMOS, the AWB is very white, maybe too white IMO than one would like to preserve the atmosphere even under the warm sunlight. But K-1 do really "catch up" with the game. ;-) I found it works best in the Natural mode, with the Saturation turned up one step.

Dynamic range is good, better than the Canon's. Noise is acceptable up to ISO 3200 and beyond that, use it unless it must be.

Lens correction now works very well. It is fast and there is no more delay as in older models, even with all the four corrected function enabled. Supported all DFA digital and FA* film lenses. DA lenses are supported in crop mode. Lens correction does not work in FF mode for DA lenses, even if they are actually FF compatible. On the other hand, for supported FF lenses, lens correction does work even when crop mode is selected.

Liveview operation is good, the liveview image will change according to the FF or crop mode selected (and of course). The LV AF is fast but unfortunate insensitive. It often missed focus with lower contrast, even under bright light situations outdoor.

There is nothing special for the video recording (movie) mode. And there is no live AF under movie mode. AF can be remeasured upon pressing of the AF button on demand by the user. It is not possible to capture any still photo during video recording.

The super articulated monitor is sturdy and easy to use, better than imagined before. Most importantly, the closed position is well aligned.

Mirror action is crisp but yet gentle, resemble the old feel of the MZ-S film flagship. The *ist D had similar feel in the mirror but however its movement is obvious too slow. Now the K-1's is quite good but I still hope that it could move faster anyway.

Viewfinder clarity is not as good as my Canon 5DIII which is brighter and clearer to see than the K-1, despite both have an overlaid LCD information display on the finder frame.

The electronic level indication is now very easy to see and follow. It is sensitive and accurate provided that you got a good copy. My first copy has good accuracy for the horizontal sensor but the vertical sensor is a little bit off.

GPS is sensitive and accurate and is very easy to turn on and off, with the dedicated button. WiFi is also easy to on and off with the special function dial. The red and blue LED indicators is a good design. However, the Ricoh Image Sync App is just a piece of junk, undoubtedly. It is difficult to use, with limited features and its operations are completely nonsense, even for the basic functions of browsing photos and for downloading.

Comments (25)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Well this a unusual positive review :-) I am stil waiting for my K1 copy ordered it 3 months ago :-(
I can't wait to put my 31 43 and 77 on it.
6 replies · active 462 weeks ago
long time waiter's avatar

long time waiter · 462 weeks ago

I'm so glad I got one when stock suddenly appeared at one of the NY stores last week. I shipped overnight to make sure it didn't slip by to someone else. Who knows how long it will take now! Hopefully soon for everyone.

My ONLY disappointment so far is the news today from Sigma. I wanted the 35f1.4ART, but it scratches the body until further fix. Hardly Pentax's fault though.
What do you exactly mean with "it scratches the body"? I am asking because I am interested in both!
It is Pentax fault, even K3 protrudes more than K5 which brings problems with some old lenses.. they should move the prism housing 1mm away from mount like they used to have it on all previous bodies including film.
not their fault's avatar

not their fault · 462 weeks ago

rubbish. it has nothing to do with the prism housing. It is entirely sigma's fault here, and they owned up to it and will be offering a repair. Nothing to worry about if you have sigma or k1. Total non-issue, but inconvenient.
I read some posts and information, I agree it's SIGMA's fault. Too wide ring (new lenses). However it is not a nice situation, but it is put right
You preordered from B&H?
Positive and nice review! Old Pentax days again?
Wonderful! Thank you for your review! Did you see the results over at DPReview where it beats every other fullframe in terms oif ISO invariance? What a IQ beast! If Pentax can improve AF performance some day soon, they'll beat everyone else.
I have only two ancient Sigma lenses, no interest to use them on K-1 anyway.
Well, those are not ancient lenses, but great stuff like 35/1.4 ART or 85/1.4 :D

Anyway it seems to be just minor cosmetic issue.. http://2.static.img-dpreview.com/files/p/TS560x56... or results http://4.static.img-dpreview.com/files/g/TS560x56... and http://3.static.img-dpreview.com/files/g/TS560x56...
great lens,bad prob's avatar

great lens,bad prob · 462 weeks ago

Not just minor cosmetic issue. It needs fixed. Otherwise, they wouldn't have said don't use. Lens must be perfectly flat on the mount.

I hope they fix it. I want the 35f1.4 instead of LTD alternative. I've seen the sample photos and made my own choice.

But I won't buy until fixed.
great lens,bad prob's avatar

great lens,bad prob · 462 weeks ago

By LTD I meant FA31f1.8, not the other ones which look great for my tastes. I just don't care for the FA31 on PentaxK1 images so far.
My FA31 works great on my K-1, no complaint. :-)
K1 give you Medium Format feeling. When using pixel shift @ max ISO it give 250MB RAW :D
1 reply · active 461 weeks ago
I think my 645D feels more like a MF than my K-1. ;-p
Thank you very much Rice for sharing your impressions :-)
So what about the chromatic aberrations with the old lens, does it seem worse than with the k5?
3 replies · active 461 weeks ago
You are welcome. Purple fringing is similar to the K-5 when pixel peep, lens correction doesn't help much, unfortunately.
prefer the FA series's avatar

prefer the FA series · 461 weeks ago

Speaking of chromatic aberrations, my FA100 macro is horrible for fringing at f2.8. Is the newer 100mm WR macro better? Anyone know?
Yes, the DFA version is better in term of CA.
waow, a long written post that never seen for years. Cool!
2 replies · active 458 weeks ago
But without any pics! ;-)
10 times better than those used official photos, copy and paste articles. :D

Post a new comment

Comments by