• News about Products and Latest Company Direction • Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues • Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
If the ISO specs were true (100-204,800) even if the pixel count is 36,4 Mp (sony sensor from the D810) the sensor is way too different And its coincident to the ISO specs of the 645Z sensor (sony 50 MP 100-204,800 ISO the same of Hasselblad e PhaseOne -> 8256x6192 resolution = 51121152 pixeis in a frame of 43.8mm x 32.8mm -> ~35584 Pixel/mm2) If the sensor is a "cropped" 645Z medium format sensor...for a 35.9 x 24.0 mm = 861,6 mm2 x 355584 Pixel/mm2 (same pixel density = 30,66 Mp differente from the announced 36,4 MP (sony/nikon) Also the frame rate of 6,5 fps is true...it will be superior to the nikon D810 5fps (it could be less unreal if we think that 30 Mp are processed faster than 36 Mp)...hardly Using a "cropped" Medium Format sensor would be a great deal...even in a strictly economic point of view of scale.... To good to be true
Logging you in...
RJR · 474 weeks ago
And its coincident to the ISO specs of the 645Z sensor (sony 50 MP 100-204,800 ISO the same of Hasselblad e PhaseOne -> 8256x6192 resolution = 51121152 pixeis in a frame of 43.8mm x 32.8mm -> ~35584 Pixel/mm2)
If the sensor is a "cropped" 645Z medium format sensor...for a 35.9 x 24.0 mm = 861,6 mm2 x 355584 Pixel/mm2 (same pixel density = 30,66 Mp differente from the announced 36,4 MP (sony/nikon)
Also the frame rate of 6,5 fps is true...it will be superior to the nikon D810 5fps (it could be less unreal if we think that 30 Mp are processed faster than 36 Mp)...hardly
Using a "cropped" Medium Format sensor would be a great deal...even in a strictly economic point of view of scale....
To good to be true
RiceHigh 110p · 474 weeks ago