(in Traditional Chinese, but pictures are all self-explanatory.)

Damn now the user manual marks it is a Ricoh flashgun, but not a Pentax! >:-(

2. http://blog.xuite.net/falconkimo/blog/167298828

Frankly, the added phone-out jack under the K-3 logo looks like a Tumour! :-o

And, the used-to-have lovely 14-stroke star-burst (of the original DA15 Ltd.) exists no more with the new "improved" Ricoh HD version of the "same" lens! :-((
Jean · 588 weeks ago
But the beautiful silver looking lens becomes very ugly when it is put on a black DSLR.
Milan · 588 weeks ago
How long before Ricoh realizes they bought a lemon when they acquired Pentax. Used DA lenses are now at an all time low. The 40mm pancake can be picked up used for $180. The DA14mm can be purchased used for around $400. These are lenses that sell new for $499. and and $949.95 at the Ricoh webstore right now. Pentax glass, especially for aspc , is just not a smart investment anymore.
Yoku2 · 588 weeks ago
Dan Johnson · 588 weeks ago
Bzrkd · 588 weeks ago
bigdaz668 1p · 588 weeks ago
zosX · 588 weeks ago
Yoku2 · 588 weeks ago
Canon cameras are far behind K-3, but it can't prevent to sell cameras.
Sam · 588 weeks ago
I don't see any dealbreaker in the K3 seriously. I'm not too sure if I mentioned it before but I do own a m43 camera, Canon 5d and 6d, Pentax K3, a fujifilm x100 plus some more film cameras that I won't bother to mention. Just in case someone accuses me of being a Pentax fanboy.
If there was a slight reduction in DR, I don't feel it in any of the real world shots that I did. In fact, I recently did a closed fashion runway shoot using the K3 and I can honestly say that the AF is much better, it locks on fast. If previously I was hesitant about using the K5 for those dim lighting shots, moving subjects and white balance control, I had none using the K3.
In fact I would probably start using it more for commercial events that I do. The full-frame cameras with their lenses are getting too heavy for me and I sometimes have to cover 12-14 hour events.
In fact I'm looking forward to pair the K3 with the new flash and see how it performs. Honestly, I think the K3 is Pentax finally delivering on the promise for a semi-pro camera. It is not the best camera (subjective anyway) but it is there. The k10d was inkling of what Pentax can do and the subsequent models was an exercise of almost but failing just. But the K3, I'd say is pretty much there, now for more Sigma and Pentax lenses.
Chris · 588 weeks ago
I think I don't have to elaborate this, but a tiny hint: the reaction would not have been favorable. But if Sony does it, it is "magic".
pentaxfools · 588 weeks ago
What makes you think Pentax could have come out with a FF? Pentax could not and did not produce a FF that is why there is no Pentax FF. Pentax has indicated more times then not that they sell APCS gear, not main stream photography gear & will not produce a FF. A this point Pentax would not be able to compete on the first tier. Those days are gone and Pentax knows this.
My Sony A7r will be here Friday! Oh yea this is not the Sony thread but you just can't stop talking about the Sony.
fred Jones · 588 weeks ago
The K-3 is just wow! I have just taken a series of pictures in a folk museum to record their Christmas displays. Its dim an dark so I started with flash. Then I just put the camera on a tripod, left the flash off and let the camera do its own thing in green mode. It was amazing. The tree lights came out well, everything was correctly focused and exposed, colour balance was just about perfect and the noise was only detectable with some severe pixel peeping. This is the camera I have dreamed of for many years. I even dare to say that an FF camera would offer little extra for most photographers. Next job is to read the manual and see what it really can do.
Sharafat1111 82p · 526 weeks ago