

Before you measurbate or even make a comment after that, do read the following Testing Conditions and Notes first! Last time, I was just too lazy to type less things as I think the EXIF data are there and my recent testing and posting methodology has been adopted for quite a while now (and should be well known). But still and unfortunately, people are confused and have been arguing! :-(
Testing Conditions and Notes:-
1. Click on any thumbnail below will open a Large Image in 10.6MP size, for both cameras. A new/separate Window/Tab will be opened. As the image size is now unified for images that are originally in different size (coz the cameras are with different pixel count, "100%" view and comparison are facilitated);
2. If you still want to download the original full size samples, just go to the individual original image pages and click "high res. image" under the "download" tab/menu;
3. Test was carried out outdoor on a bright sunny day. All samples taken handheld for the same scene, at the same place, at the same Av, at the same focal (as indicated on the zoom lenses' scales), at nearly the same time. Besides, no lens hood was put on the lenses of both cameras;
4. Detailed settings of the NEX-5 for making the samples are as follows:
"Standard" "Creative Style" with Default Parameters (Factory Defaulted), Av Mode, Manual ISO (of course), DRO/ Auto HDR Off, AF/Central AF Point, Auto WB, Large Fine Jpeg (in 14M), Evaluative Metering (No Exposure Compensation, No AEL), Auto NR (no further setting can be adjusted anyway), Lens OSS On (Factory Default);
5. Detailed settings of the K-x for making the samples are as follows:
"Bright" "Custom Image" with Default Parameters (Factory Defaulted), Av Mode, Manual ISO (of course), DRO/ Highlight/Shadow Correction/HDR All Off, AF/Central AF Point, Auto WB, Large Fine Jpeg (in 12M), Evaluative Metering (No Exposure Compensation, No AEL), High ISO NR "Weak"/Starting from ISO 1600, Body SR On (Factory Default);
6. What to Measurbate? (I won't comment further - you judge yourself! Different people could have different observations and opinions anyway! :-)) Inspect the samples and see the colour response, exposure accuracy, resolution/focusing accuracy - for both central and corner "sharpness", sharpening artifacts, sense of perspective/3d feel and so on..
Well, let's go! :-o
Scene 1, at Infinity, 24mm f/8:-
ISO | NEX-5 + E 18-55/3.5-5.6 OSS | K-x + DA 16-45/4 |
200 | ![]() | ![]() |
400 | ![]() | ![]() |
800 | ![]() | ![]() |
1600 | ![]() | ![]() |
3200* | ![]() | ![]() |
Scene 2, at Middle/Far Distance, 28mm f/11:-
ISO | NEX-5 + E 18-55/3.5-5.6 OSS | K-x + DA 16-45/4 |
200 | ![]() | ![]() |
400 | ![]() | ![]() |
800 | ![]() | ![]() |
1600 | ![]() | ![]() |
3200 | ![]() | ![]() |
Next Coming../Blog Trailer:-
BIG Question: Would Turning On/Off the SR of the K-x on A Bright Day Affect Image Shaprness??
Further Reading:-
Sony NEX-5 and NEX-3 Hands-on Impressions / Quick Review
Summary Matrix for Equipment Tests and Reviews
Yun · 764 weeks ago
Deds · 764 weeks ago
drondrive 21p · 764 weeks ago
BBen · 764 weeks ago
Best of Best · 764 weeks ago
Your comparisions are LAMER'S work and waste of time.
ART · 764 weeks ago
Ikoflex · 764 weeks ago
drondrive 21p · 764 weeks ago
Aspa · 764 weeks ago
Any test make a sense if you give same chance to tested items to show they best.
Auto mode in any camera is just a set of choices made by programmers. For example: in same light condition one camera will speed up the shutter and another step down aperture - each one give you same exposition in EV sense, but second one can show better sharpness. Unfortunately, it tell you nothing about real sensor performance...
Your procedure is perfect for point and shot cameras with free-focus, plastic lenses. In this case everything depends on the settings in auto mode. But DSLR and even EVIL cameras are a little bit more than P&S and users pay for this. If they want the best of the equipment, they should used the brain with the finger on shutter button. If they will rely on auto mode only, maybe even Nikon D3 could be worse than NEX. 'cos the second one have a better program line? But - is it a better camera too?
rhermans · 764 weeks ago
So it comes to what I need in a camera, and the no viewfinder on the sony makes it not an option.
Juice · 764 weeks ago
Aramiss · 763 weeks ago
Fred · 762 weeks ago
Which one would you carry if you were going to choose only one?
shawk · 738 weeks ago
posible as it is bkoz 'its a sony'