Just see what happens for what it is compared against the Olympus XZ-2 and the Q10:-
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Compare-Camera-Sensors/Compare-cameras-side-by-side/(appareil1)/854|0/(brand)/Pentax/(appareil2)/841|0/(brand2)/Olympus/(appareil3)/828|0/(brand3)/Pentax
Well, it tells that the XZ-2 and the MX-1 are actually the same camera inside, as most of the marks are just so close, or just identical! :-o
As to compare with the Q10, the MX-1 actually doesn't have a real edge over that little "crappy" ILDC with a smaller 1/2.3" sensor! ;-)
Wednesday, March 06, 2013
Logging you in...
Comments by IntenseDebate
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Anonymous · 627 weeks ago
It's a Sony IMX144CQJ.
It's the same BSI CIS that's in all ofd the current type 1/1.7 inch cameras (aside from the odd companies that still makes their own ... Panasonic?). That's why they all have the same Dxomark within experimental error.
They have different lenses ...
RiceHigh 110p · 627 weeks ago
Fred · 627 weeks ago
I'd wager in exactly the same factory, with the same lenses and the same circuitry. Different shell and different OS / algorithms.
I'll tell you exactly the conversation that occurred:
Senior PRIC Exec: Which segments of the compact camera market are the most profitable?
PRIC Analyst: Ruggedised and Premium Compact fixed zoom.
Senior PRIC Exec: We are in ruggedised, how do we get into Premium Compact fixed zoom quickly and cheaply?
PRIC Analyst: Piggyback off Olympus' OEM factory activities in Indonesia.
Senior PRIC Exec: Make it so.
Anonimity is Great · 627 weeks ago