Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: My 5D3 Vs K-5 Realworld Shootout

Monday, May 14, 2012

My 5D3 Vs K-5 Realworld Shootout



Test Conditions:-

5D3 with EF35/2, K-5 with DA21/3.2; Shoot at f/8 at nearly the same time (just note the positions of the moving objects like the clouds); ISO 100; Evaluative metering for both and exposure results are really close; Auto white balance; Colour profiles: 5D3: Standard 2, 0, 0, 0, K-5: Natural +1, 0, 0, +1, +1(FS) - both are my own preferred defaults chosen for the most accurate colour rendition/tone response and good but yet natural per-pixel sharpness after extensive testing.

Click any of the thumbnails below to enlarge new image in about 4,000 pixels in width. So, the comparison is in the same large size for both cameras' images.

Okay, let's go!

Scene 1:-
5D3
K-5


Scene 2:-

5D3
K-5


I won't give my own comments about the image quality differences this time. It would be better for you to measurbate and decide! Do feel free to say what you've discovered in the comments section below. Don't be shy and you maybe the one who has found something unique but yet very true! :-D


Related:-

Pathetic Canon's External Auto Saves the Pathetic TTL of Pentax!

5D3 Vs K-5 ISO Shootout (100 to 25600)

New 5D3 Release Suspends My Pentax Purchasing Plans

K-m Olive Vs 5D Pixel Peeping

Comments (40)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Andrey Poznyak's avatar

Andrey Poznyak · 669 weeks ago

I think the center is equal or k-5 little better, but the 5d has more sharp edge
2 replies · active 669 weeks ago
Over all sharper image from the 5D3 but the K5 does put up a good fight. If these are as shot then the 5D3 also produces much better colour and saturation out the box. Image of the K5 looks a little washed out exposure off a little maybe.
7 replies · active 668 weeks ago
almost same.....
importance is price.K5 sales less than USD900 !!!!
Both cameras produce great images. The Canon is a bit sharper, and is a fine camera, as is the Pentax. However, the 5D Mk 3 is around 4 times the price, body only, to the best price of the K5 in OZ.
The law of diminishing returns certainly rules.
THIS JUST IN: The 5D3 is a better point and shoot camera than the K-5!
Show some RAW files and we'll talk, until then this is nothing but a P&S comparison.
2 replies · active 669 weeks ago
5d3 marginally better but not three or four times as the price difference suggests!
Why did you resize the pictures ?
1 reply · active 669 weeks ago
Illustra's avatar

Illustra · 669 weeks ago

You guys must be joking... the IQ from the 5Dm3 are miles ahead of the K5. For professional work, those miles count!
barbarosa's avatar

barbarosa · 669 weeks ago

Jpeg engine of 5D is better than K5 one that is only thing that you can prove with this
And is well known that canon have better jpegs.

Compare Raws if You want to prove something, it would be sad that Mk3 lose from "old" K-5.
To be honest, for me measurbate jpg from camera are totaly unfair for both cameras.
I have my K-5 over year. And I still learning what can I get from single RAW file. Those scene are not relevant for testing in my opinion. I will show you what I mean.
This is very difficult scene. (shot with Sigma 10-20). unprocessed is stright converted by ACR7, processed is made in LR4.
Unprocesed
Photo & Video Sharing by SmugMug
Processed Photo & Video Sharing by SmugMug
if links not work please look at: http://smu.gs/JbWZHQ

So as you see looking in jpg's is simple mistake for me. Today sensor are so good you need very good software and knowledge to use all of it's pros. For me what is most important are cons. What is color clipping, How 5MK3 deal with RGB LED color lamps? how about blowing out pixels by monochrome light? how about purple firing? what is darkness and in lightness? How I can manipulate RAW. Those are real questions.
1 reply · active 669 weeks ago
Finally sold my K-5 week ago. I need working AF, good halogen light performance and good lens prices. Good bye Pentax
7 replies · active 669 weeks ago
I'm alway amused when compairing cameras like this...As i mentioned some weeks before, it's comparinig like two cars....
one "middle cost" like Volkwagen to a high cost car...like ferrari or porsche...one should know that a porsche is faster, better,...........................
but is a vw such a bad "car designer or "maker""?...even if pentax has not a market share as canon has...for that price of ~900$ you'll get a solid camera...not good as the 5D3 "porsche" but not such a bad one a lot of people claim...I don't like such comparisons...Do not compare apples and oranges..........................
1 reply · active 669 weeks ago
This is too evenly matched, you should comare the K-5 to a Hasselblad.
2 replies · active 667 weeks ago
Yes I see difference, and even if price was no issue. I would still chose Pentax. I love this brand, and K-5 clearly stands strong next to this heavy weight 5D3.
1 reply · active 669 weeks ago
A suggestion: print in big size then post(show) photos in a shopping mall and ask to people to choose the most beautiful.
Interestingly there is also a comparison of samples at all ISO between these two cameras in the review of the Canon 5D Mark IIII here: http://www.neocamera.com/camera/canon/5dmarkiii/s...

Post a new comment

Comments by