
Test Conditions:-
5D3 with EF35/2, K-5 with DA21/3.2; Shoot at f/8 at nearly the same time (just note the positions of the moving objects like the clouds); ISO 100; Evaluative metering for both and exposure results are really close; Auto white balance; Colour profiles: 5D3: Standard 2, 0, 0, 0, K-5: Natural +1, 0, 0, +1, +1(FS) - both are my own preferred defaults chosen for the most accurate colour rendition/tone response and good but yet natural per-pixel sharpness after extensive testing.
Click any of the thumbnails below to enlarge new image in about 4,000 pixels in width. So, the comparison is in the same large size for both cameras' images.
Okay, let's go!
Scene 1:-
5D3 | K-5 |
![]() | ![]() |
Scene 2:-
5D3 | K-5 |
![]() | ![]() |
I won't give my own comments about the image quality differences this time. It would be better for you to measurbate and decide! Do feel free to say what you've discovered in the comments section below. Don't be shy and you maybe the one who has found something unique but yet very true! :-D
Related:-
Pathetic Canon's External Auto Saves the Pathetic TTL of Pentax!
5D3 Vs K-5 ISO Shootout (100 to 25600)
New 5D3 Release Suspends My Pentax Purchasing Plans
K-m Olive Vs 5D Pixel Peeping
Andrey Poznyak · 669 weeks ago
ali · 669 weeks ago
Metalica · 669 weeks ago
importance is price.K5 sales less than USD900 !!!!
Richard · 669 weeks ago
The law of diminishing returns certainly rules.
MrBig · 669 weeks ago
Show some RAW files and we'll talk, until then this is nothing but a P&S comparison.
robra · 669 weeks ago
Simon · 669 weeks ago
Illustra · 669 weeks ago
barbarosa · 669 weeks ago
And is well known that canon have better jpegs.
Compare Raws if You want to prove something, it would be sad that Mk3 lose from "old" K-5.
Piotr · 669 weeks ago
I have my K-5 over year. And I still learning what can I get from single RAW file. Those scene are not relevant for testing in my opinion. I will show you what I mean.
This is very difficult scene. (shot with Sigma 10-20). unprocessed is stright converted by ACR7, processed is made in LR4.
Unprocesed
Processed
if links not work please look at: http://smu.gs/JbWZHQ
So as you see looking in jpg's is simple mistake for me. Today sensor are so good you need very good software and knowledge to use all of it's pros. For me what is most important are cons. What is color clipping, How 5MK3 deal with RGB LED color lamps? how about blowing out pixels by monochrome light? how about purple firing? what is darkness and in lightness? How I can manipulate RAW. Those are real questions.
krasitsky 35p · 669 weeks ago
Benji · 669 weeks ago
one "middle cost" like Volkwagen to a high cost car...like ferrari or porsche...one should know that a porsche is faster, better,...........................
but is a vw such a bad "car designer or "maker""?...even if pentax has not a market share as canon has...for that price of ~900$ you'll get a solid camera...not good as the 5D3 "porsche" but not such a bad one a lot of people claim...I don't like such comparisons...Do not compare apples and oranges..........................
Walt · 669 weeks ago
IlmarsM · 669 weeks ago
pscl57 · 669 weeks ago
Zak · 669 weeks ago