Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: DC Resource K-01 Review: Pentax QC Disaster!

Tuesday, May 08, 2012

DC Resource K-01 Review: Pentax QC Disaster!

http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/pentax/k01-review

Quoted:-

"I want to expand on my experiences with Pentax quality control (or lack of it). The weeks I spent with the K-01 were frustrating. My original K-01 would produce out-of-focus photos about 50% of the time, with multiple lenses. I exchanged it for a second body, which did not have that issue."

And five out of seven individual lenses (same or different models) tested have de-centering defect and produced blurry photos as a result once the de-centering defect came into play! What?! My Pardon?? >:-o

"Unless I've had an incredible run of bad luck, it seems that quality control at Pentax needs some work. Having a defective camera body and two brand new de-centered lenses is not what I'd expect from them. If you get a lens that is properly built and calibrated, then you'll get very nice results. If something seems amiss, however, keep exchanging it until you're happy."

Btw, ISO samples are also provided, with that rare 'problem-less" DA40XS kit lens.

And, their conclusion may not be that favourable neither, even if the user finally gets a K-01 body with some Pentax lenses with no defect! :-(

"The K-01 is, by far, the largest mirrorless ILC on the market, due to its native support for K-mount lenses. It's about as large as an entry-level D-SLR, which sort of defeats the purpose of being mirrorless in the first place. It's shaped a lot like a brick.."

"Camera performance is where the K-01 starts to fall behind the competition. The camera starts up fast enough (in just over a second), assuming that you've turned off the startup screen. It's the K-01's autofocus speeds that are its weak point."

"If you read the introduction to this review then you know that I had some frustrating experiences with the K-01 and several lenses. It took two K-01 bodies and seven lenses to complete this review -- double what was expected."

After all, it seems that despite that now Pentax lens prices are "great", their QC is yet not that great. So, my last hope for Ricoh to improve is now proven to be in vain. Bad! :-(


Old Related:-

De-centering Defects of Pentax Lenses

Comments (3)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Well, while very bad, it is a small sample size right? I doubt we would all run into the same extreme level of problems that he encountered. Also, he said that it is typical for him to go through multiple lenses and bodies for a test, but that his experience with Pentax was the worst (double what was expected -again small sample size). There are possibly some bugs and QC issues with the K-01 which I would expect Pentax to address. However, no one else thus far has mentioned these issues in a review. We'll see what dpreview has to say about it soon. You said yourself that it is not that big and that the focusing is decent ( not as bad as reported). Based on my rental of a K-01 I found it to be okay size wise and that the focusing is fine for the most part. Could it be better? Sure, but it is not that bad eiter and he states as much in his review. Obviously they need to improve the auto focus, and put the body on a diet. It is a first stab at ILC for an SLR lens mount, and overall I think they are pretty close. Meanwhile, I will attempt to take pictures with my horrible Pentax lenses that are all grossly decentered and focus poorly. How I ever get decent shots is beyond me.
1 reply · active 670 weeks ago
So far I have owned two DA 18-55, one SA 18-55, two DAL 18-55 and one DA 18-55II of Pentax and I concur to agree that the Pentax QC with these kit lenses (especially the latest DAL) isn't that great neither.

Btw, I have sold all of them already and now only keep the 18-55II, which (my copy) is nice.
A real shame for Pentax. They have great products, but with their inability to implement proper QC they are slowly but surely digging their own grave.
I used to have a K10, K20 and K5. I had many issues with my K5 that were probably due to a defective body. Same thing with a DA* 16-50 and 50-135 pro grad lenses. I even sent them to be fixed, but nothing was really different.
After being so tired of all these issues and their stupid price policy, I finally sold all of my gear to embark the Nikon FF boat.

Post a new comment

Comments by