So, let's view the Japanese PhotobleNet gallery again, there have been a lot of K-x photos uploaded recently:-
http://pentax.photoble.net/?L=en
The good thing for viewing samples at the PhotobleNet is that most of the shooting information and picture data are posted, which are indeed quite valuable.
I have read 10 pages and selected some of the images for brief discussion here:-
Picture | Page Link | My Comments |
http://pentax.photoble.net/?exif=091021005 | This LightRoom converted picture is nice, although I would prefer more contrast and sharpness. The colours are okay but not something that worth a Wow. | |
http://pentax.photoble.net/?exif=091021009 | One of the first in-camera HDR samples that you would find on the Net. Not bad for the pic. As for ISO 1600 with medium Noise Reduction, the noise is well controlled whilst loss of image details is not too severe. | |
http://pentax.photoble.net/?exif=091021006 | A 20 second exposure at ISO 1600 (Medium NR setting). Quite impressive! Well, I think the K-x is really a night camera and it is well suited for Astrophotography. | |
http://pentax.photoble.net/?exif=091021007 | The Sirius Star was shot at ISO 800 *without* NR. Really impressive, again! | |
http://pentax.photoble.net/?exif=091021010 | The picture generally lacks contrast, good colours and sharpness. The poster writes that he PSed the shot for the car name plate but I don't think this would cause too much impact in the IQ of the picture. Disappointed result anyway. | |
http://pentax.photoble.net/?exif=091019002 | Ditto. I am not impressed with the contrast, colours and sharpness of this pic. The DoF is shallow but the lack of sharpness is just too obvious - see the animal's right eye. | |
http://pentax.photoble.net/?exif=091019001 | This one seems better but the blue colour of the sky don't look very pleasing. | |
http://pentax.photoble.net/?exif=091019003 | This one is better but still not up to my expectation in term of Image Quality. The Bokeh of the kit lens is not too good neither in this shooting condition, also. |
Well, in short, I think the K-x is an excellent indoor and night camera. But on the days, so far I am not impressed with the daylight photos. I am afraid that K-m is still the King of IQ in Pentaxland if you take pictures on bright days, with richer and more eye-pleasing colours, better contrast as well as better sharpness and image details. In fact, most of the day sample photos of the K-x I have seen so far resemble quite some of the unfavourable IQ characteristics of the Nikon D90, which I don't like.
p.s. The only favourable day-time K-x samples I have seen so far would be this one, which I think the IQ is very good:-
http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2009/10/korean-k-x-special-page.html
Enche · 803 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 803 weeks ago
Sometimes shooting "same scenes" also doesn't help as different cameras behave differently for different scenes. As for the case of K-x, I guess at night scenes it will do better but not so for day scenes, for example.
Michael · 803 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 803 weeks ago
Somma · 803 weeks ago
Somma · 803 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 803 weeks ago
kadajawi · 803 weeks ago
Btw., why is everyone so obsessed with the noise the cameras make in JPEG mode? Who cares? I want to know how much noise the camera really has -> RAW files. That's a much better way to determine noise levels, because you can really see the sensor quality there.
RiceHigh 110p · 803 weeks ago
Btw, what you show and we see is just very normal. Our DSLRs are not having cold sensor nor it is cooled! :-)
kadajawi · 803 weeks ago
Enche · 802 weeks ago
For serious / pro. Good jpg engine saves a lot of time and time is money. In the field of candid / photojournalism, a pro friend admitted they never shoot raw for several years now because their client want the images asap, and they usually just give the memory cards after finished shooting.
I have the leisure of one or two days to edit the pic after shooting for clients but I also shoot JPG most of the time. it saves a lot of storage space and time.
I currently only shoot RAW if the lighting is hard (mixed or high contrast).
RiceHigh 110p · 802 weeks ago
Enche · 802 weeks ago
kadajawi · 802 weeks ago
FRANK D · 803 weeks ago
Somma · 802 weeks ago
I can say that per-pixel resolution is really good. No any problems with colours at all.
JPEG is rather special, but it could be tweaked easy.
kuuan - andreas · 787 weeks ago
I have been shooting RAW and converting with Lightroom ver 1.3
Does anybody have a hint how I can improve of the daytime photos? - or I may just try to get rid of the camera again :-(
RiceHigh 110p · 787 weeks ago