Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: Ken Rockwell's Leica M9 Samples (Full Size)

Thursday, October 08, 2009

Ken Rockwell's Leica M9 Samples (Full Size)

Further to my previous report on the new Leica M9, here is the latest news update: Ken Rockwell has posted some brand new M9 samples, taken with his various old Leica lenses!

http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/m9/examples.htm

Wow, the Image Quality is really impressive, I have to admit. The optical quality of the lenses have yet once again shown to be excellent and the new body does produce very good results.

I have to say I am super jealous of Leica users who are now having the option of putting their old film lenses onto a Full Frame digital body - just look how Ken Rockwell put his 39-year old standard 50mm and took the picture! And it remains a 50mm lens! Now, all of their lenses are given new lives and actually re-born. I just wonder when are all those old Pentax film lenses (many of which are excellent) owned by all those old-school K-mount users and Pentaxians over the world can be re-born. And, hopefully even there will be one (a Full Frame Pentax DSLR body), the K-mount in it will NOT be a crippled one! Oh, no... please.. But also, only if Pentax the brand and system will survive..! (How long and will it? Who will be the next to own "Pentax"? And, will the next owner just simply drops the brand like what Sony did to (Konica-)Minolta??)

Comments (7)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
It's a shame those leica cameras and lenses cost kazillions of dollars a piece
1 reply · active 805 weeks ago
What "shame"? It's called LUXURY! (but with Excellence!)
Nice microcontrast indeed but that noise in the ceiling shot, at iso 250… Rice, aren't you shocked ?
MichaelAlex's avatar

MichaelAlex · 805 weeks ago

What about the darker blue circles in the sky? Maybe a QC issue in Germany as well??? How come you are not mentioning those and not wondering why "Excellence" is not perfect at all! Can you see it? Unless they are embedded Leica logos in blue on purpose... Maybe Pentax can try blue K to match that "Excellence" and charge another $5000+ extra....
1 reply · active 805 weeks ago
Well, as long as there is *choice*..
the noise is not so appealing, probably K7 jpg can beat it, but the detail and sharpness is top notch, my eyes almost bleed lol
1 reply · active 805 weeks ago
I think the details could be good as long as RAW is shot and proper converting software with proper settings are used at the same time. In-camera Jpegs are too blurry and noisy to be usable, which is a sad thing as JPEG actually is the most handy mode for real photographers. I do believe photography is about taking photographs, but not post-processing!

Post a new comment

Comments by