Well, there is no new nor special information over there but I think the presentation is nice!
http://www.popco.net/zboard/view.php?id=just_arrived&no=111
The girl and product photos are very nice but from the EXIF (if any preserved for some of the photos) I can see that these are not taken with Pentax gear but just a Kodak FF DSLR anyway.
The sample movie clips are in Flash format. They look nice for the colours and sharpness I would say but there is some jumpiness. It is actually unknown for whether it is caused by format conversion loss for dropped frames or the source video clips are just like that, nevertheless.
Update (10-17):
Sample K-x photos uploaded at the Korean site:-
http://www.popco.net/zboard/zboa ... esc=asc&no=5787
http://www.popco.net/zboard/zboa ... esc=asc&no=5794
http://www.popco.net/zboard/zboa ... esc=asc&no=5820
Well, those are downsized and without any EXIF data. But what I want to say is those pictures are looking . . . . really nice!
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Logging you in...
Comments by IntenseDebate
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Enche · 804 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 804 weeks ago
noou · 804 weeks ago
Enche · 804 weeks ago
noou · 804 weeks ago
also, i don't know if it's already been noticed: the pentax k-x "review" on flickr has been updated with a second part: http://www.flickr.com/photos/29738823@N02/sets/72...
imo, very interesting results, not only at high iso
Ivanko · 804 weeks ago
noou · 804 weeks ago
however the reviewer says the k-x is pretty expensive compared to its competitors, costing 700 GBP... which indeed is not true: http://www.bestcameras.co.uk/shop/acatalog/Pentax...
S
Ivanko · 804 weeks ago
It's the worst colour in Pentax cameras which I've ever seen.
noou · 804 weeks ago
Somma · 804 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 804 weeks ago
Somma · 804 weeks ago
noou · 804 weeks ago
imo, they look great (apart from some jello)