@ ISO 12800 and 6400:-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/29738823@N02/sets/72157622549473808/
Really impressive, I have to say, for the noise control and details retained. The colours still look odd but these are extreme conditions and the (auto) white balance can't be perfect anyway.
Update (10-16):
According to information provided by "noou" (thx indeed :-)), here are more latest K-x samples uploaded by the same person:-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/29738823@N02/sets/72157622410764903/
Now we can see low(er) ISO ones, also.
• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Comments (18)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
K-x Super High ISO Samples
2009-10-10T12:27:00+08:00
RiceHigh
Image Quality|K-x|Samples|Sensors|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hin Man · 805 weeks ago
Thank you for sharing links and with positive comment on K-x. Any chance that you will upgrade your K-m with K-x. If not, why not. I don't know about you, I love occasional movie for traveling. And the color choices are just wonderful add-on. Please get me more excited so that I come to you often to see positive comments.
Your admired friend -- Hin
Enche · 805 weeks ago
Seriously, i find the noise rendered very smooth and art like rather than usual electronic noise. Good job i must say.
SatriaK · 805 weeks ago
Alain Dumas · 805 weeks ago
Johnny · 805 weeks ago
Alain Dumas · 805 weeks ago
Johnny · 805 weeks ago
What you seem to be talking about is dynamic range / SNR, not NR.
However, I agree with all these sample images being pretty worthless. In about a week maybe we will see some better ones.
Alain Dumas · 805 weeks ago
Enche · 804 weeks ago
Enche · 804 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 804 weeks ago
francisco · 804 weeks ago
Have a good day.
Francisco
RiceHigh 110p · 804 weeks ago
The worst thing is that they have yet been pretending to be good and "fair". In fact, that "rule" was tailored made for me after they had seen that I occasionally posted my links (but all relevant to the topics of discussions, I have to say). They had to use that "newly" made "rule", hadn't they?
Apples and oranges · 804 weeks ago
francisco · 804 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 804 weeks ago
apples and oranges · 804 weeks ago
Maxime · 787 weeks ago