

(N.B.: I hope the Red Dot in the above Pentax Q Image is NOT a Hot Pixel! :-o)

I don't know what the products "D" and "E" are actually, I guess nobody even knows whether these are the products of Pentax or not, I think the comparisons are just intended to show that the PQ of the P-Q is good enough.
On the other hand, on the day of when the Pentax Q was announced after embargo had ended, the IR posted immediately their ISO measurbating samples at the following page of their P-Q preview:-
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/PENTAXQ/PENTAXQA7.HTM
However, the samples have been shortly withdrawn under the pressure of Pentax, as it is told in the above page, quoted:-
"We'd like to offer our apologies for taking down our page of half-resolution sample images from the Pentax Q; we received notice after publication that Pentax didn't want even reduced-resolution images from the Q prototype displayed, and we naturally respect their wishes."
In fact, I have previously gone through some of the samples and what I want to say is that the PQ of the P-Q is not bad by the DC standard but of course it is nothing that can be compared to the larger sensor ILDC systems nor DSLRs.
Besides, sometimes I just wonder, why Pentax/Hoya needs to be so conservative about the posting of the "unapproved" stuff. I still recall that Dpreview has posted so many times for the full size samples from many beta cameras including those from Canon and Sony. What to be afraid of and about? Simple ask the reviewers to make a remark for what posted are from beta cameras - end of case!
Update (6-26): Someone at the DPR Forum has previously made a comparison between the P-Q, NEX and the S95, the picture is self-explanatory. See:-

(Click to Enlarge)
1001noisycamera 98p · 717 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 717 weeks ago
frankd · 717 weeks ago
Dissapointed · 717 weeks ago
"Pentax, Just Good Enough."
Dissapointed · 717 weeks ago
"Pentax, We Make Slow and Crappy Zooms."
or
"Pentax, Premium Prices for Poor Products."
or
"Pentax, Just Not Good Enough."
:(
Spellcheck. · 717 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 717 weeks ago
Alex · 716 weeks ago
Kliwon · 701 weeks ago
Mage · 717 weeks ago
Alex · 716 weeks ago
Come on, you can say it's useless (and I agree, they could at least say something like 'typical premium compact camera' or even better, telling the sensor size); but they can't use their competitor's names!
RiceHigh 110p · 716 weeks ago
Chris · 717 weeks ago
the Pentax marketing department you complain so much about has most probably defined the specs on the recent GPS add-on with astro-tracing. Can you really look into a mirror and say that marketing is crappy?
Pentax, with its WR bodies and lenses, the fantastic compact bodies and DA limited lenses, and the GPS is THE offering on the market for the outdoor semi-pro photographer. Name any other company with an offering of similar quality and features! There is NONE.
C
Fair go. · 717 weeks ago
This new Pentax should be tested before condemnation, and compared with like, not dslrs with larger sensors.
2Qornot2Q · 716 weeks ago
junyo · 716 weeks ago
Mike Lambert · 717 weeks ago