Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: The Pentax Q Announced!

Thursday, June 23, 2011

The Pentax Q Announced!



Dpreview previewed:-
http://dpreview.com/previews/pentaxQ/

The pop up flash look funny and special, recall me of those lift-up cage on trucks for highway/road maintenance! ;-D

A side-by-side size comparison to the NEX-C3:-



The shutter is inside lens:-



The new Q lenses (2 Auto, 3 Manual "Toy" fixed aperture "low-cost" lenses):-
http://dpreview.com/news/1106/11062310pentaxqlenses.asp



The official specifications of these lenses in details can be found at the Japanese homepage of Pentax:-

http://www.pentax.jp/english/news/2011/201109.html


High-performance Series Unique Series
Product Name PENTAX-01
STANDARD
PRIME
PENTAX-02
STANDARD
ZOOM
PENTAX-03
FISH EYE
PENTAX-04
TOY LENS
WIDE
PENTAX-05
TOY LENS
TELEPHOTO
Lens Mount PENTAX Q (Metal mount) PENTAX Q (Plastic mount)
Flange Focal Length * 9.2mm
Lens Construction 8 elements in
5 groups
8 elements in
7 groups
6 elements in
5 groups
4 elements in
3 groups
3 elements in
3 groups
Angle of View 49.5° 76.0° - 29.0° 160° 64° 24.5°
Focal Length
(in 35mm format)
8.5mm
(47mm)
5mm - 15mm
(27.5mm-83.0mm)
3.2mm
(17.5mm)
6.3mm
(35mm)
18mm
(100mm)
Aperture F1.9 F2.8 - F4.5 F5.6 F7.1 F8
Diaphragm Control Automatic Fixed
Lens Shutter O -
ND Filter O -
SP (Super Protect) Coating O -
Minimum Focusing Distance 0.2m 0.3m
(whole zoom area)
0.09m 0.07m 0.27m
Maximum Magnification approx. 0.05x approx. 0.06x approx. 0.06x approx. 0.15x approx. 0.08x
Filter Diameter 40.5mm Not compatible
Maximum Diameter 45.5mm 48.5mm 40.6mm 40.6mm 40.6mm
Minimum Length 23.0mm 48.0mm 30.5mm 25.0mm 19.5mm
Weight approx. 37g approx. 96g approx. 29g approx. 21g approx. 18g
Hood MH-RA 40.5mm
(option)
PH-SBA 40.5mm
(option)
Not compatible

The prices of the lens as shown in the Japanese Pentax Online Shop are as follows:-

01 STANDARD PRIME Bundled (Body + 01 Lens = ¥69,800) (US$872.5)
02 STANDARD ZOOM¥24,800 (US$310)
03 FISH EYE¥9,800 (US$122.5)
04 TOY LENS WIDE¥5,980 (US$74.75)
05 TOY LENS TELE PHOTO¥5,980 (US$74.75)

Besides, the optical viewfinder accessory O-VF1 is asked for ¥19,800 (US$247.5)

And, other official pages about the Pentax Q are as follows:-

Pentax Q Special Site (Japanese): http://www.pentax.jp/japan/products/pentax-q/

The Pentax Q Introduction and Full Specs: http://www.pentax.jp/english/news/2011/201108.html

Yet, there is another preview with hands-on video at Engadget with more product images:-
http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/23/pentax-releases-q-worlds-smallest-interchangeable-lens-digital/





You can see clearly the tiny sensor and the look and design of the new Q-mount in the above video.

In addition, the Akihabara News also had a similar hands-on report with video:-

http://en.akihabaranews.com/99434/icon-cat/press-conference/hands-on-pentax-introduces-a-new-compact-camera-with-the-pentax-q

http://vimeo.com/25493612

Finally, Ned has a larger official family photo for the Pentax Q (which could not be found elsewhere so far!):-



Last but not least, the IR has pixel-peeped the Q, already!

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/PENTAXQ/PENTAXQA7.HTM
[Update (6-25): All samples have been withdrawn upon the request from Pentax. :-(]


Previous Reports:-

The "Pentax Q" Specs and Product Images Leaked right Before the Official Announcement (Today)

As the ILDC World Turns.. (June 20)

The Pentax Q is to be Announced on June 23rd (June 19)

The "Pentax Q" (New Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens System w/ Small Imager) (June 3)

Comments (22)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Oh Gawd! O_o
Oh Gawd! :|

They should just stock to the name NC-1 (Brain Dead One).
2 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
所謂”腦殘一號”是了麼? :-D
Yep that's thhe one :) The Mainland Chinese users sure come up with some funny names for camera gears.
Very good IQ at this size sensor, external flash interface, manual modes, leaf shutter to sync flash to high speeds, compact body, interchangeable lenses. Why should one need a dslr who is exposing his pictures just in the Internet.
4 replies · active 717 weeks ago
Yes, for web sized photos, prosumers, DCs or even cameraphones are all we need! ;-D
Horrible IQ at this price point. If I have this money I'd rather buy a NEX-3. Doesn't look much larger (and the NEX-3 has a wonderful size). Images are way superior. Or just buy a Panasonic LX5. Better image quality, half the price. Or a Canon S95 or Nikon P7000 (same as the LX5). Or a Canon SX130 IS with probably rather similar image quality, full manual controls, RAW (via hack), and it doesn't even cost a quarter. And covers a larger zoom range. Actually I have the SX130.
That's right, but then you also don't need an ILC. Marketing-wise Pentax have shot themselves in the foot a few times, I'm afraid this time they shot themselves in the head. Hopefully the APS-C model will be more common sense, and have the K-mount on board (with a new mount, hardly any current Pentaxian is likely to buy it)
With K-mount mirroless pentax won't shoot their head but cut it off ;)
It will be too huge, no point at all. May be adapter, but the native mount must not be K.
On the other hand, the APS-C mirrorless will kill any reason to buy Pentax DSLR. But, to be honest, Samsung NX-20 will kill it anyway: it has better pancakes than DA Ltds, it's more compact than "compact" pentax DSLR's and it suits hobbyists very well and I see no reason to use Pentax for pros.
Wait and see.'s avatar

Wait and see. · 717 weeks ago

Very low noise at iso 1600. Probably better than Canon G10 or Nikon Coolpix.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
How about comparing like with like? (with ILCs = GF, NEX)
Don't want a new lens mount; to many of us in the U.S. the main attraction of Pentax is that we have lots of old lenses we can use. Expensive, too. Finally, "special" is one word for the flash -- I'd call it "atrocious". Ugly, impractical, destined to be broken promptly. I'm generally something of a Pentax apologist, but I'd only get excited about this camera if it was given to me free.
2 replies · active 717 weeks ago
illdefined's avatar

illdefined · 717 weeks ago

the flash can fire unextended as well.
I did eventually figure that out; it's less awful than I first thought! I'm hopeful for future developments of this concept, but for now I'm happy with my K-5. (A FF mirrorless that takes K-mount lenses is what i'm hoping for, but I will not be holding my breath.)
This camera at this price point is a joke. WTF were they thinking? I know what.. they weren't. They must be bleeding money right now. I don't see how they can be profitable selling their stuff. The Sony NEX line of cameras is my choice of camera unless someone comes out with a Full Frame mirrorless :)
Why isn´t LS in some K lens? Shitt... *55 LS with X sync 1/2000 will be dreamlens. And huge magnet across Canon and Nikon users.
Maybe they will offer a K-mount adapter.
Should be possible, as the Q has no mirror and the lens can be positioned slightly in front of the camera.
3 replies · active 717 weeks ago
The Q mount does not have mechnical link of any sort, so if they were to make an adaptor, then the adaptor will need to have Adature lever for the DA lens that does not have Apature ring!

And even then ALL you K mount lens will be manaul only - manual focus/ manaul apature.

Somehow I doubt this will be very realistic.

They really have shot themselves in the head this time! If this thing sells for $300 then maybe there will be a cult following but $800???

To think, materially this thing shoudn NOT justify $800 tag at all!
No a K to Q mount won;t be practicale.

1. Due tot he sensor size conversion ratio, even a 18mm lens would become a short tele. The only usable lens as a standard would have be the 12-24!

2. The Q mount is pure electronical. How do you control your apature on your DA lens? If you include apature mechanism in the adaptor itself, then what do you do with those FA lens WITH their own aparture rings?

3. All PK lens will become pure manaul lens with no auto function what-so ever.

I don't think such an sdaptor will make any sense. However, as is the fact that Pentax released the Q, I won;t be surprised if they are going ahead to do even more senseless things...
15Ltd will be about 83mm equivalent. The 77Ltd will be supertelephoto range lens. And their optical quality is too low to use it with such a tiny sensor.
Pentax where are you going with this? I'm affraid your going alone on this one. At a price point of 800, tsk tsk tsk ...if you made something like this for less than 500 then maybe..

Keep it up and this might be a Q for you to close shop.

Post a new comment

Comments by