http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Pentax-K5-II-Showing-the-competition-how-it-s-done/Comparisons
Same overall score as the K-5, but with slightly better sub-scores. All in all, no big differences.
Still, I am quite sceptical to those DxOMark results. As it is stated, the K-5 and K-5II is one mark ahead of the Canon 5D MkIII, which I also have. I have been using both cameras extensively for months already up till now. In practice, I yet found the 5D3 is better in IQ than the K-5 in almost every aspect, except the DR, which the DxOMark test result for this should be true. Btw, here are two old head-to-head tests of mine between the two cameras. Go figure out yourself!
1. My 5D3 Vs K-5 Realworld Shootout
2. 5D3 Vs K-5 ISO Shootout (100 to 25600)
In particular, the red colour smear of the K-5 images is so obvious and its sensor and image engine combo is just unable to handle these situations well, whilst the 5D3 performs far better in similar cases. The 5D3 also wins in more detailed and accurate colour rendition and in resolution, too, of course.
• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Thursday, November 22, 2012
DxOMark for K-5II is Out
Comments (22)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
DxOMark for K-5II is Out
2012-11-22T15:15:00+08:00
RiceHigh
Colour Accuracy|Image Quality|K-5II/s|Other Bodies|Other Systems|Reviews|Sensors|Software|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
amnesix · 642 weeks ago
Gabriel Fontes · 642 weeks ago
Well, DXO shows that 5D mark III is almost a stop better in high iso...
Maybe overall the K-5II's image quality is better, indeed.
homo faber · 642 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 642 weeks ago
homo faber · 642 weeks ago
As far I remember, You complained a couple of weeks ago about Pentax failing to deliver new sensor quality with new K-5 II and K-5 II s. Am I right?
Now, as we know the score of K-5 II and had the possibility to study RAWs from K 5 II and K 5 IIs, it is almost certain, that K 5 II S will be much better as the old K-5.
So I think, Pentax managed to make a good progress with better AF, improved shake reduction and better sensor performance.
RiceHigh 110p · 642 weeks ago
twil · 642 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 642 weeks ago
homo faber · 642 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 642 weeks ago
jaad75 · 642 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 642 weeks ago
VladimirYo · 642 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 642 weeks ago
homo faber · 642 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 642 weeks ago
homo faber · 642 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 642 weeks ago
homo faber · 642 weeks ago
VoiceOfReason · 642 weeks ago
http://photorumors.com/2012/11/21/dxomark-pentax-...
"With an overall score of 82 the Pentax K-5 II (and its predecessor the K-5) are at the same level as the likes of the Canon EOS 5D MKIII, which scored 81. At the time of writing, it is actually eleventh out of ALL current cameras, only trailing behind offerings from Phase One and Nikon, each costing many times as much.
The Pentax K-5 II is a remarkable piece of kit, it scores better in the DxO mark tests than several very highly thought of, full frame DSLRs, beating all the cameras made by Canon! It manages to do this in a body that is very reasonably priced."
Read more on PhotoRumors.com: http://photorumors.com/2012/11/21/dxomark-pentax-...
Jaz Johal · 642 weeks ago
Too bad pentax marketing has not done a better ( or at least their proper job) communicating the message of the cameras strengths of the likes of the K5's and K30 and Q etc.... what market and what users they are for.
twil · 642 weeks ago