Read here, for the most interesting part of it:-
http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/pentax_q10_review/image_quality/
I think it would have been great if they compared the IQ against the Q side-by-side, but they didn't, nonetheless.
• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Sunday, November 18, 2012
First Q10 Full Review, and its Image Quality
標籤:
Image Quality,
Lenses,
Prices,
Q System,
Q10,
Reviews,
Samples,
Sensors,
Shake Reduction
Comments (4)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
First Q10 Full Review, and its Image Quality
2012-11-18T01:58:00+08:00
RiceHigh
Image Quality|Lenses|Prices|Q System|Q10|Reviews|Samples|Sensors|Shake Reduction|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Sebastoamp · 642 weeks ago
Arn · 642 weeks ago
He makes a nice statement in the article's comments :
"...In every Pentax Q review comments you can always count on a thoughtful response, based upon no experience with the camera, like we see from JS. Frankly, I used to think like him and I could not get past thinking small sensor = crap results = why bother. However, looking at some of the results and experiences of Q owners opened my eyes and I finally “got it” (after which I bought an original Q kit with the 8.5mm f1.9.
It is an amazing camera. It was so great to be able to have a camera on me AT ALL TIMES. (This is what cargo pockets were made for). The best camera is the one you have with you and there is never a reason to be without the Q on your person. (It is that unobtrusive).
The image quality will probably surprise you. It has a lot of the same features as the full size Pentax DSLRs (RAW capability, multiple exposure, exposure bracketing, built-in intervalometer, shake reduction, etc.)..."
phoenix15 · 642 weeks ago
Dawid · 642 weeks ago
PENTAX K-5 II review:
http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/pentax_k5_...