Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: Prime M Cameras Have Only Electronic SR for Video Recording

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Prime M Cameras Have Only Electronic SR for Video Recording

Two weeks ago, Blog reader "daedbird" first reported that the video recording quality of his K-01 was greatly degraded when the SR was turned on against off. When the SR was activated, obvious rolling shutter effect was seen.

Yesterday, another Blog reader "kadajawi" has responded and writes that it is all about the electronic SR that is actually adopted for all those Prime M Pentax cameras for the Movie mode, K-30 and K-01 inclusive. On the other hand, the K-5 cameras which have the Prime II processor use the hardware SR, i.e., sensor movement, to compensate for the hand shake during video recording.

To verify this, I have checked the online user manuals of the K-30, K-01, K-5 and the K-5II/s as well. It is found that the SR for Movie is defaulted to On for the K-30 and K-01 whilst for the K-5 and K-5II, it is default to be Off instead. So, the supposition of "kadajawi" seems to be true for that "coincidence". Nonetheless, no Pentax manual has ever told anything about the actual SR method and the working principle of it, which yet looks like top secret of their cameras but which we users should actually know about.

Yes, the electronic SR is noiseless but it sacrifices video quality. The mechanical SR is noisy but this problem can be overcome by mounting an external microphone with a shock mount. So, all in all, this is not a real problem and better sound reception quality is gained with the use of an external microphone (and with stereo sound recording possibility too). In practice, my own experience that is the body sensor SR is very useful for handheld video recording to stabilise the video and this feature is still useful when monopod is used.

After all, I think Pentax should give all the Prime M users an option, in the firmware and user menu, for the choice of the SR method via electronic (software) mean or yet the conventional mechanical one, then that would be the best.


Related:- 

Definite Guide on External Video Microphone Selection for Supported DSLRs (Brand Regardless)

A Not-so-common K-30/K-5/K-01 Comparison of Mine

Comments (6)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Very useful comparison, please when will be possible add the K5II/K5IIs, thanks!
2 replies · active 641 weeks ago
As mentioned already, the K-5II/s is same as the original K-5.
is the same also for the Live View Exposure Delay and Overall System Time Lag?
Heidfirst's avatar

Heidfirst · 641 weeks ago

mechanical sr can cause sensor heating when used for video ....
electronic sr doesn't.
Hello all,
I was an owner of K-5 camera and now I have K-30. I have checked it just now and I can confirm that this information is NOT true. K-30 uses the same sensor shift SR in movie mode as does K-5 camera. I can hear the same whistling noise during the movie record by putting my ear to the K-30 camera as I was hearing with the K-5. I have no doubt that sensor is moving inside the body and the SR in video mode seems to be similarly effective. Moreover this sound is also present in recorded movie when SR is on. With SR off there is no disturbing sound in the recorded movie.
I just don't know. I really think that review sites need to build a image stabilization test for video to show the capabilities of each camera. I really would like to see video shot from a Prime M and a Prime II camera to see which is better or if they are the same.
Also it would be great if Pentax chimed in. And if it is electronic versus mechanical, and it was possible to add mechanical to the firmware of a Prime M, I would love the option. CLearly, there is no mechanical issue, since there is the mechanical SR in the K-01 for stills (as well as for dust removal).

Post a new comment

Comments by