Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: DxO Scores Comparison (Pentax Against Others)

Saturday, December 12, 2009

DxO Scores Comparison (Pentax Against Others)

As you may have known, the DxO Sensor Marks for the K-7 has been published.

So, how is it compared to others? Of course, you can measurbate endlessly with their "Compare Cameras" Tool. But for quick reference for all readers here, I tabulate the results of some of the current popular models of APS-C DSLRs, of different brands in the market, as below, ranked by the overall DxOMark (Highest Mark First):-

Make & Model
DxOMark
(Overall Mark for Measuring Image Quality of the RAW file)
Dynamic Range (in EV Steps)
Highest Low Light ISO Speed
(Maximum Tolerance Limit for the Same DxO Reference Standard)
Nikon D90
72.6
12.5
977
Nikon D5000
72
12.5
868
Nikon D300s
69.8
12.2
787
Sony A380
67.4
11.8
614
Sony A550
65.8
11.8
807
Sony A350
65.4
11.5
595
Canon 7D
64.9
11.7
809
Pentax K-m
63.5
11.4
513
Canon 500D
62.5
11.5
663
Nikon D3000
62.4
11.1
563
Pentax K-7
61
10.6
536

Of course, if you are to compare Full Frame models, they will give much better results and hence higher marks. The same logic applies to 4/3 and m4/3 half-frame models, which have lower marks. So, the sensor size is just the determinative factor here. And, it proves once again that packing more pixels a smaller APS-C sensor makes no sense!

Furthermore, it can be noted that newer camera models usually should produce better results than the olders, especially when they have the same pixel count or using the same (series of) sensor, but there are some exceptions occasionally, the K-7 is unfortunately the case, of which all the test scores and IQ performances are all worst and inferior than its Predecessor, the K20D! :-( (But that exactly what I have been talking about since the first K-7 samples appeared on the net and after I measurbated it myself, also.)

Read Also:-

Why the IQ of the K-7 (Sensor) could be Worse than That of the K20D?

Comments (10)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
i shall replace my k100d with a nikon d90...
1 reply · active 796 weeks ago
Or maybe with a Pentax K-x. I would be very curious about that little Pentax's DxO-mark scores - but surely it would be much (!) better, than the K7's.
The numbers are irrelevant. Try to take the same picture with the D90 and the K7, print them and after say to me what is the better camera. Pictures are not numbers and the image quality is not only noise and dynamic range. Pentax understand it instead of you Rice! Go out ad shots. Everyone wants the Kx sensor on the K7 but have you shot the same photo at lower iso and print it? The K7 is vibrant, the Kx is "washed"
2 replies · active 795 weeks ago
I took the same pictures with the K-7 and my 5D at every ISO. The K-7 pics and crops sucked! View:-

http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2009/07/my-k-7-hands...

In fact, the DxO figures resemble much my bad experiences about the K-7.
Have you use the 18-55?! Come on Rice...it's like tu use a Ferrari with Suzuky tires! What I want to say it's that when you watch a print made by the 5D (FULL FRAME) you see that it's extremely "digital" insted the K7 could have much noise at 100% crop but when you print a picture it looks more natural with more 3dimensional effect and better coluor and the noise become irrelevant. To see the noise that you see in a 100% crop you have to print a commercial poster! Have you ever done it? Nobody has.
This is making me once again think about switching to Nikon. Or maybe Canon.

First the k10d had its terrible autofocus, and now the k7 is full of noise. I was really disappointed with my photos when I first got it.
1 reply · active 795 weeks ago
Full of noise? What are you saying? The noise of the K7 is wonderfull instead of the K10. Try to develop a raw files. You are speaking about nothing because if you tried to print a photo taken with K7 your idea will immediately change. Believe it
Not only does Pentax offer backward compatibility with its old lenses, but they are going backward with their image quality, too!

Now the entry-level camera gives better results than the flagship?!? What gives?
I think you forgot the Samsung GX20 it is in 4th position after D300s.
1 reply · active 794 weeks ago
The GX-20 got much better results than the K-7 and is yet slightly better than the K20D.

Post a new comment

Comments by