The famous Leica blogger, Steve Huff, reviewed the K-5, as he did the first time for Pentax with the K-7:-
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2011/01/10/the-pentax-k5-digital-camera-review/
A nice review from an user perspective, surely not for measurbation purposes nevertheless, as there are simply no larger sized samples. Moreover, I am sure that there is no "18-200" kit zoom for the K-5! Is there one? Any? ;-D
• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Monday, January 10, 2011
Comments (7)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
Steve Huff Reviewed the K-5
2011-01-10T18:19:00+08:00
RiceHigh
Image Quality|K-5|Lenses|Reviews|Samples|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
flomat · 742 weeks ago
Barbarosa · 742 weeks ago
alarming for him, maybe soon He will have nothing to write about
I dont think so, he just to have pretty good imagination to ''invent'' problems if cant find real ones.
Richard · 742 weeks ago
Ying · 742 weeks ago
What has the world come to?
Shaq · 742 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 742 weeks ago
Chris · 742 weeks ago
His "real world" perspective is one of a photography-loving guy and therefore very relevant to people like me. His review of the K7 was very well written, went into great depth and would have convinced me instantly to purchase the K7 (but I had it already when I found his review).
The K5 review is much shorter because of the many similarities to the K7. Whoever has not read Steve's K7 review, it is absolutely recommended reading and will help you re-discover the fun part of photography!
If any, Steve has an inclination toward Leica, not Pentax. Oh well, maybe towards smaller rather than larger companies. Again, very likable, because people who tend to choose the bigger brand (it is more successful, so the products must be better, right? - dream on) do not support competition, which is essential for further development.
C