
(Image Source Page: http://product.pchome.net/dc_nikon_d800/picmore-265747-3956555.html)
via the latest Nikon D800 Rumour and Specs at the Chinese PCHome:-
http://product.pchome.net/dc_nikon_d800/param_265747.html
(Google English Translation Here)
If the rumour is really true, I just wish to ask: Why NOT?? >:-(

(Source Article: The World First / Pentax First: My (Obsolete) Pentax Collection)
At least the excellent and well-built Pentax MZ-S had one. But then one may say that the MZ-S is not a true pro cam anyway! :-o :-(

(Source Article: "Film is Dead"! ;-))
illdefined · 732 weeks ago
illdefined · 732 weeks ago
Tomasz Worek · 732 weeks ago
brendanfong 29p · 732 weeks ago
Tomasz Worek · 732 weeks ago
brendanfong 29p · 732 weeks ago
Here: http://strobist.blogspot.com/2008/11/on-axis-fill...
Zebooka · 732 weeks ago
It can be used, but professional can afford more expensive solution:
- For remote triggering he/she can use radio triggers with full ETTL/iTTL support
- For fill light he/she can use external more powerfull and rotating/bouncing flash
RiceHigh 110p · 732 weeks ago
Moreover, one can still use external flash and external trigger with a DSLR with built-in flash. So, it is just an additional option, and it is a very handy one.
Simon · 732 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 732 weeks ago
Fortytwo · 732 weeks ago
And yes, it's just Canon and Nikon. A $40,000 Hasselblad does have one: http://thephoblographer.files.wordpress.com/2010/...
Who's the pro now?
jaegermeister · 732 weeks ago
Someone · 719 weeks ago
A pop-up flash will be used on a D7000 ever week. A pop-up flash will be used on a D3X...when? In a showroom maybe, but that's pretty much it.It would add cost and no value.
standor · 706 weeks ago