



(Above: First and Last Pictures - ISO 3200 with the Pentax Q)
First of all, view this Flickr gallery:-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/n00bs/sets/72157627083831739/with/5943039553/
Test samples in Large (but not Full) Size (in 3200 x 2400) preserved with Complete EXIF data are posted. Do note that those are real-world shots taken both indoor and outdoor and for various subjects including portraiture and scenery. But the undoubtedly more important thing for the pixel peepers is that the ISO speeds used ranged from 125 to 3200! :-o By inspecting those real-life samples, we can now have a much better idea about the IQ/PQ of the Q and how it should perform actually, e.g., with the standard 8.5mm "01" prime lens. And, will the small sensor with supposed to be better optics plus more intensive image processing do the magic? Go figure out yourself! :-D
It should be noted that the firmware version of the Pentax Q under test is in 0.30 as shown in the EXIF, that means that it is yet a beta firmware, with Pentax normal tradition of firmware numbering, i.e., production firmware version should be named as 1.00 and above.
Furthermore, there are some other interesting photos posted in which the objects in the photos are somehow special, including a never-seen-before Pentax Q with transparent outer shell as well as the never-mass-produced Pentax Full Frame DSLR prototype K-1. Go have a look and I'm sure that you, as a Pentaxian, will not be disappointed! Do note again that all photos were made with a Pentax Q!
Last but not least, the same author posted also a "movie (hands-on) review" of the Pentax Q. In which, we can see clearly about some of the operations of the Q, and more importantly, we can finally learn something about the system performance of the Q, for the first time, e.g., the AF speed and responsiveness and rate of continuous shooting:-
(URL: http://youtu.be/RRbi_zEK5GI)
Enjoy! :-D
Hayami · 712 weeks ago
When you look at the original JPEG at 100% There is quite a numbers of dead pixels in the sample!
Hektor · 712 weeks ago
ERR · 712 weeks ago
Simon · 712 weeks ago
Zebooka · 712 weeks ago
Simon · 712 weeks ago
It doesnt need a 5D2 to take good photos, right.
frank · 712 weeks ago
frank · 712 weeks ago
Michael A. · 712 weeks ago
frank · 712 weeks ago
not only do this give us 100 colors and styles with the kx
now they have small camera with the Q...i'm sure the Q will come out in colors too.
VoiceOfReason · 712 weeks ago
Michael A. · 712 weeks ago
eddie boschma · 712 weeks ago
There are some test pics of the K-5 with SMC 31mm limited here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/emboschma/sets/72157...
Video with the Sigma DX HSM 8-16mm here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sN9JYPESO5I&fe...
K-5 is an amazing camera with white balance mistakes in my case sometimes. A real lowlightqueen and topnotch apc-s dsrl!!
Colors are much more realistic than with my GH2 set - GH2 has def. better resolution, is very analitical and has furthermore convenient codecs.
Ying · 712 weeks ago
It looks very DC like.
RiceHigh 110p · 712 weeks ago