Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: Are You Interested to Acquire the MX-1?

Tuesday, January 08, 2013

Are You Interested to Acquire the MX-1?

At the weight of nearly 400g (loaded and ready) and at the price of (US)$500, would you consider to get one?

Do you intend to get the MX-1?
  
pollcode.com free polls 
Time (UTC +0800):
標籤： , , ,

Comments (14)

Loading... Logging you in...
Dashboard | Edit profile | Logout
  • Logged in as
Loading...
0 Vote up Vote down
dinneenp's avatar - Go to profile

dinneenp 1p · 642 weeks ago

it all comes down to how it compares in size, usability & speed compared to other compacts, e.g. Canon S series, Panasonic LX series or Samsung EX (which has an articulated screen too)
0 Vote up Vote down
Victor's avatar

Victor · 642 weeks ago

I just don't understand why anybody should buy a camera that takes just a bit better photos than a smartphone does.
3 replies · active 641 weeks ago
+2 Vote up Vote down
Fred's avatar

Fred · 642 weeks ago

Why take time to make comments when you have no idea what you are talking about?

It is like the polls where you have "yes", "no" and "no opinion" choices.

All of the "no opinion" choosers are taking time out of their moronic lives to demonstrate that they are clueless.
Loading...
+2 Vote up Vote down
RiceHigh's avatar - Go to profile

RiceHigh 110p · 642 weeks ago

Keep calm, my friend! I almost chose "no opinion" in the poll, although I finally didn't put mine actually~ :-D
0 Vote up Vote down
Victor's avatar

Victor · 641 weeks ago

Well, my opinion is simple. Smartphones produce crappy images. The cameras like the announced one aren't far away from the smartphones. So why should you pay for another equipment if you get almost nothing compared to what you already possess?
0 Vote up Vote down
badsykes's avatar

badsykes · 642 weeks ago

Because of the lens
0 Vote up Vote down
daedbird's avatar

daedbird · 642 weeks ago

Put a Q mount on this, and make the lens a Q lens........and that should work
0 Vote up Vote down
Simon's avatar

Simon · 642 weeks ago

In my opinion P&S cameras are obsolete, the built in cameras in mobile phones are becoming better and better.
+2 Vote up Vote down
Kuba's avatar

Kuba · 642 weeks ago

Yes, I aree that PR should, as some say "Jump Sheap" of P&S cameras but IMO it's a nice piece of junk.
+1 Vote up Vote down
Pentax SX's avatar

Pentax SX · 642 weeks ago

all depend on price, 500 is over priced.
look at Canon S100, Olympus XZ-1, Samsung ZF2, they are all around 350 mark.
If MX1 is around 300, we might have our chance in the market.
1 reply · active 642 weeks ago
Loading...
+2 Vote up Vote down
RiceHigh's avatar - Go to profile

RiceHigh 110p · 642 weeks ago

Let's don't buy it for one year and after then it will be sold at 1/3rd of the original marketed price! ;->
0 Vote up Vote down
Zebooka's avatar

Zebooka · 642 weeks ago

Nope!

Another fail from Pentax.

1) overpriced for list of features it offers.

2) no hot shoe, but bulky size like LX7/XZ2/EX2F

3) no optical or electronic viewfinder

4) no wide lens (no 24mm, only 28mm)
0 Vote up Vote down
kadajawi's avatar

kadajawi · 642 weeks ago

Brass body. Hell yes am I interested. But this should be the Q. Better sensor size, better design. And a camera with the MX name should have an interchangeable lens, no?
0 Vote up Vote down
645chap's avatar

645chap · 641 weeks ago

Pentax o' Pentax... why can't you use the resources to develop something more worthwhile like probably a WR ultrawide DA... instead of another junk ol fun el chic stuff ... which only appeases those fanboys still living in delusion.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)