




Pretending Zeiss lenses? Marked "Aperture / Focal" something, instead of marking "Focal / Aperture" (which is the common convention of the industry) and particularly not "Pentax / Focal" which has been done for over twenty years for all PENTAX AF lenses since early 90s! Again, Ricoh's intention is clear, Pentax will be extinguished step-by-step and some days later this name will be removed completely and they (Ricoh) will get their final "success"! >:-o


N.B. All lenses above are mine and these images are completely copyrighted by me - All rights reserved!
Sébastien · 601 weeks ago
For such pictures a wide-angle is not recommended.
Are you one of those who blame his material for the quality of a picture?
James W · 601 weeks ago
Firstly - they all do seem to have Pentax written on them somewhere, and secondly there have been lots of promises that the name will stay.
But consider this also -
1. It's only a brand name. "Marathon" bars got renamed "Snickers" in the UK to much protest, but when people realised it was the same yummy milk chocolate and peanut treat... Life carried on and no-one was seriously injured. It's only a brand name. They come and go. Pentax doesn't even seem to be a very powerful brand name in the camera market, and a joke in the pro market... so frankly... What's worth fighting for?!
2. If Pentax was strong enough to survive solo they wouldn't have ended up owned by other people. But they are, and Hoya decided they wanted shot of Pentax, so sold to Ricoh. An alternative may have been packing up completely. It's thanks to Ricoh that there is any future in the k-mount system at all. Ricoh bought it fair and square, arguably rescued it from Hoya. It's their possession now and they can do what they want with it. They want to sell cameras and lenses in a long-term sustainable way. We want to buy them. Our interests are aligned.
3. My first k-mount SLR was a Ricoh KR5 Super II. My second the excellent Ricoh XRX (much better value than anything Pentax had at the time, albeit not a great "looker"). So they have history. Not sure what's to be afraid of.
4. I - like you - have a large investment in k mount glass. The dslr business moves very fast and products date much more quickly than they did in the film era. I'm delighted that ANYONE is keeping the ecosystem alive. The nightmare alternative is *no-one* makes k mount bodies or lenses any more... Leaving us with a pile of unsaleable glass and nothing to stick it on.
5. On the new lenses... Who on earth cares what they look like on the outside?! Black, silver, red stripe, green stripe... I honestly couldn't give a monkeys. Are you a gear collector or a photographer?!
6. There have been some (modest) product releases this week. Why not be grateful and celebrate them? We're hoping for good news on the 5th sept too. There'll no doubt be pleasant surprises and annoying missteps in that release... But imagine a world where the k500 is the last ever k mount dslr... And be grateful stuff is happening!
Chill out! It's only a camera, and pentax is only a sticky label.
James W · 601 weeks ago
foton · 601 weeks ago
Machael · 601 weeks ago
you to longtime Pentax fans and a clear signal as to the direction that Ricoh is headed with it's obviously demoted Pentax "product line." Fanboys can make all the excuses for Ricoh they want but this clearly shows disrespect for Pentax history and culture and that is not good news!
Simon · 601 weeks ago
James W · 601 weeks ago
And for those who are completist about green stripes - there's always eBay.
badsykes · 601 weeks ago
zosX · 601 weeks ago
PS: I never liked the silver name plates on the DA lenses. The 18-135 is a much nicer design. I think it even looks nicer than the zeiss lens you have pictured there. Though the zeiss is all metal and glass. Wish I could say that about pentax primes these days....
Dominique · 601 weeks ago
1 more vote to support the "Pentax" name and what it stands for.
X.9. · 601 weeks ago
All new HD limiteds sport "HD Pentax - DA" letters on the front their hoods (DA40) or around them (DA 15, DA21, DA35, DA70) depending how much space there is. Then lenses like DA40, DA70 and DA21, because of their design that allows it, also have same writing around the plastic of the front element.
I also like "Zeiss type" nomenclature, which is concise, takes less space, and is more modern than the old Pentax way was (and which was borrowed form Canon, and was also written in very Canon's fashion — very old-fashioned).
For those who cry about green ring missing, check your facts: Canon *also uses green rings*. Canon also uses bright red rings for L lenses (but they look plastic, unlike metallic HD Pentax rings), then golden rings, silver rings and no rings at all. Also, Canon places rings at the front of their lenses mostly, Pentax now mostly towards the rear elements. DA* are an exception.
I'm also surprised you and others never cried about Pentax sporting golden rings for the DA* lenses, which was obviously stolen fashion from Nikkor lenses, even their placement. Sometimes you can't tell the difference between the two when mounted on a camera.
All this tells us that there are limited number of options available to identify so many lenses produced today. Some overlapping is inevitable and is pointless to argue about it.
Anyway, all this is long overdue rebranding of an iconic optics brand like Pentax. Apple went through the same: I still remember old Apple fanboys crying whenApple abandoned their rainbow, and then rebranded itself using the G3 iMac plasticky/aqua blob as the theme. It was going on like that for many years, before they switched to metallic / grey look, when iMac became flat, with an advent of iPhone, etc. So is short period of 12 years Apple rebranded itself constantly.
I'm glad Pentax got a chance too, finally.
Dan Johnson · 601 weeks ago
Alexia · 601 weeks ago
btw. I am sure that you can get the SMC variants less expensive than the HD variants. NOW ist the best time to buy all the green rings.
VoiceOfReason · 601 weeks ago
Simon T · 601 weeks ago
I do feel as do some others that Ricoh are trying to "Ricoh invade" the Pentax brand and put more of their name on it. Reality is most folks think Ricoh make copiers and not cameras, whilst they've been around a while, they have fairly limited experience in the photographic market.
And let's be blunt, paint job on limited lenses, and "updated" flashes, are just another word for RICOH PRICE INCREASES
Joseph S. · 601 weeks ago
Andrés · 601 weeks ago
bossa · 601 weeks ago
sebas · 601 weeks ago