http://www.imaging-resource.com/camera-reviews/sony/a7r/#IQC
Well, I blog, you decide. You could read the comments and remarks by IR but I think the posted picture samples and crops are self-explanatory by themselves.
• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Thursday, November 07, 2013
A7R IQ Shootout with Other FF Bodies and 645D
Comments (20)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
A7R IQ Shootout with Other FF Bodies and 645D
2013-11-07T16:51:00+08:00
RiceHigh
645D|Colour Accuracy|Full Frame|Image Quality|Other Bodies|Other Systems|Reviews|Samples|Sensors|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Arn · 592 weeks ago
Mike Kawasaki · 592 weeks ago
But in any case, IR testz with thoze bottlez are boring. Normal people take different picturez in real life, that even poor performing Sony A7 can make looking worthwhile, especially scaled down for web galleriez.
Mike · 592 weeks ago
tipentax · 592 weeks ago
bossa · 592 weeks ago
Dan Johnson · 592 weeks ago
I don't care much for tests where the cameras have made differant adjustments on their own (ie. blur, noise, saturation, moire) but it's nice to use as part of our comparison of in-camera JPEG processing so I thank you for that, but when I spend over $1000 let alone $2000 I like to compare RAW files with 14 bit color depth and the same settings/modifications (like you useually post) more of a test of hardware than automation.
As for the authors idea of throwing a medium format camera in the mix (I'ts not intended to be fully automated), he's using pretzel logic to prove his opinion while leaving out cameras that fit in your coat pocket.
Uncle Vova · 592 weeks ago
Thank you.
Andrés · 592 weeks ago
Anonimity is Great · 592 weeks ago
Heiko · 592 weeks ago
And then: one of the stand-out "features" of the 645D - which it already got much praise for - is its big, uncluttered and - as far as I'v read - great to look-into viewfinder. That for some might be even more important that its one frame per second speed. Oh: and don't forget about all the really pricy legacy glass that still works.
"Horses for courses", I guess?
PS.: the 20-40mm f/2.8_f/4 limited DC WR has landed!
I still cannot believe they actually ask for the best part of 900€ ( 285grams makes this so sexy yet soooo expensive!)
Uncle Vova · 592 weeks ago
difuee 18p · 591 weeks ago
Price, size, and image quality difference?
A7R is a clear winner
tipentax · 591 weeks ago
difuee 18p · 591 weeks ago
tipentax · 591 weeks ago
difuee 18p · 591 weeks ago
tipentax · 591 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 591 weeks ago
Steve · 591 weeks ago
Andrew Munster · 510 weeks ago