See this experiment by this Pentaxian whom has newly purchased a K-r:-
http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=953899&extra=page%3D1
(Traditional Chinese, Google Translated English Page Here)
In this reply post, the OP writes the test conditions of his and and the shocking finding/conclusion of his experiment:-
http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=953899&page=1#pid11231193
Translated, "On tripod, 2 sec self-timer, with each WB setting 5 shots were taken (3 from infinity to a mid-distance object and 2 from near distance to the same object for the lens), the focus for each WB group are close enough whilst the focuses between different WB groups are very different! So, it is concluded that a (different) WB setting actually changes the focus. If it is not a real problem, I have nothing more to say!"
He also stated that he has been a user of K100D, K200D, K-m and K-x also and has never ever encountered the same problem! He further said that he would go to the local Pentax Customer Service Centre for help when he has the time. But what can I say to him is just: Good Luck, Guy! May God bless You!!
I dare to bet they will "play" him to death till the end of the world without any practical solution nor any real and responsible action that could help the suffered users, as that have been happening and being reported from time to time by our Pentax users, almost daily! >:-[
• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
K-r Focus Varies with Different WB Settings! +_="
標籤:
Focusing Accuracy,
Issues,
K-m,
K-r,
K-x,
K100D,
K200D,
Reviews,
Service Quality
Comments (25)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
K-r Focus Varies with Different WB Settings! +_="
2010-11-17T22:48:00+08:00
RiceHigh
Focusing Accuracy|Issues|K-m|K-r|K-x|K100D|K200D|Reviews|Service Quality|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Erika · 747 weeks ago
Does the focus on lower end Pentax DSLR's depends on color temperature of the scene, focus sensor sensitivity to IR or both?
If it does depend on color temperature, then maybe Pentax firmware on K-r is trying to adjust focus (based on color temperature set) in order to avoid focusing errors?
Just a thought.
RiceHigh 110p · 747 weeks ago
Moritz Schwertner · 747 weeks ago
A light source which flickers a lot creates different white balance settings in a glimpse of a second, every single camera will struggle with those, I guess!
http://www.moritzschwertner.de/
FieldofWheat · 747 weeks ago
Once upon a time RiceHigh lambasted Pentax for focus inaccuracy caused by shifts in the colour of the light, now he's at them for correcting the problem.
The solution is, of course, to do what any photographer would do and set a correct white balance for the conditions.
The moronic thing to do is to run some sort of "test" that the camera would not encounter during normal shooting conditions and then put the word problem on the camera rather than the "tester".
We saw the same thing with the DPReview comparison test where the K5 images were just plain out of focus, and then they said the camera churned out soft images.
Proper testing is a very rigorous thing. DPReview seems unable to do it, Rice's Chinese friend seems unable to do it (or at least come to the right conclusion), and I've yet to see a test from this blog that I would consider trustworthy.
Zebooka · 747 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 747 weeks ago
If Pentax could not measure the error of AF with their SAFOX non-Plus, just let it be and don't "compensate" it by silly guess works via software trick!! >:-(
Anu · 747 weeks ago
The colour of light does influnce the operation of the AF of the phase detect sensors of all DSLRs. If setting WB (correctly) manually allows for more accurate AF operation, that is a very good feature indeed.
RiceHigh 110p · 747 weeks ago
My top-of the-line *Pentax* MZ-S and the low-end MZ-30 film AFSLR do not suffer, both neither! And neither do the Canon DSLRs that I have ever used, high or low end regardless, either! So?
Anu · 747 weeks ago
As you bring film bodies into this, I seriously doubt, you've done controlled pixel peeping studies on them, comparable to the pixel peeping accuracy you may do on digital.
It is a contraint of the PD AF technology that does this.
RiceHigh 110p · 747 weeks ago
Anu · 747 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 747 weeks ago
skina · 747 weeks ago
In above article it is written "... he has been a user of K100D, K200D, K-m and K-x also and has never ever encountered the same problem!". But here you write "Only Pentax DSLRs suffer most".
K-r versus the whole other Pentax DSLR, isn't it?
RiceHigh 110p · 746 weeks ago
1. Pentax DSLRs suffer from Yellow Light Front Focusing AF Symptom than any others including their own film AFSLRs;
2. Pentax tries to do software tricks to compensate the error of the Yellow Light Symptom but it is proven to be failed but just more inconvenience induced!
Clear enough this time?
Anu · 746 weeks ago
Fact: PD AF is problematic in different light conditions and with different lenses used. Maybe the lenses you used on film bodies had less sphrical aberrations (maybe they were less ambitious designs) than the one's you use on digital. Or maybe you just don't know how to properly analyze things as it would take all the fun out of Pentax-bashing :)
j viviano · 747 weeks ago
Lots of older cameras have trouble with auto-focus under tungsten. Here, pentax has implemented a solution to that problem, by recognizing when you are, in fact shooting under tungsten light.
RiceHigh 110p · 747 weeks ago
Lurker · 747 weeks ago
I can't wait to get a K-r
Anu · 747 weeks ago
Oh, btw, I think it is a bit silly how you always tend to put a "thumb up" to your own posts...
RiceHigh 110p · 747 weeks ago
Anu · 746 weeks ago
Anu · 746 weeks ago
mike · 747 weeks ago
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-k-r-for...
mike · 747 weeks ago
But setting K-r with tungsten wb and af adjust -5 looks more precisely.
Chris · 682 weeks ago