
(K-5, NR Auto, ISO 1600 - All Details are Washed Out!)
• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Comments by IntenseDebate
GraphAD · 747 weeks ago
I think it's time you change brand. Leica seems a good camera brand for you.
j viviano · 747 weeks ago
Anu · 747 weeks ago
spawn · 747 weeks ago
illdefined · 747 weeks ago
you're begging for attention and Pentax finally getting some good press with the K-5 is your best chance to get noticed. Keep costing Pentax customers RiceHigh, maybe one day you will get your wish and be the only one left.
Jeuti · 747 weeks ago
Completely · 747 weeks ago
jaad75 · 747 weeks ago
Mr Big · 747 weeks ago
Why would anyone apply NR to an ISO1600 image that has virtually no noise whatsoever?
Cause you know... some people might actually come to question such a move...
Noname · 747 weeks ago
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/K5/FULLRES/... http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D7000/FULLR...
The noise reduction applied in camera is not the best way to deal with noise. It is better to remove noise in post processing.
Noname · 747 weeks ago
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/K5/FULLRES/...
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/K5/FULLRES/...
When comparing the images above, locate the same red fabric shown at the beginning of this thread. The amount of details retained in the images is pretty good.
Riverlim · 747 weeks ago
Toomas Kadarpik · 747 weeks ago
It just proves, you are not professional enough to judge things like that. Imagine this type of NR can be positive in some images.
david · 747 weeks ago
Seriously, I think this is your dumbest outrage in awhile. Noise reduction sucks for every camera, and real photographers don't use it. Did you even look at the image without any noise reduction? The detail is there, and that image looks so great.
Hey, maybe you should only use noise reduction when there is actually a lot of noise......
I think it goes to show how much of a hack you are that you didn't reference the actual website that did the testing at all, just some cruddy chinese forum where one loudmouth spouts off....and at least he referenced the dang test site.
For reference, here it is - http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/K5/K5A7.HTM
And you gotta love his tagline on his post - "Virtues of filial piety as the first, my heart would wish to trace, non-poor family would like to trace filial child prostitution led evil, whether on the track thinking, There are no worthy of thinking."
teusrenes 48p · 747 weeks ago
As is discussed above me.
Richard · 747 weeks ago
Results: problems for every camera.
Then try it for tvs, cars, airlines.
Lame · 747 weeks ago
roberto · 746 weeks ago
janneman · 746 weeks ago
I have a red lawnmower (still awaiting the K-5 for the one true test) and under certain exposures the red color does pose a problem (also with K-x and K-7 and yes, also Nikons and Canon (I have tried)). Easily solved in Lightroom by slightly desaturating the reds. All detail lost will appear like magic.
Walter · 746 weeks ago
david · 746 weeks ago
Goliath · 746 weeks ago