Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: WHY HOYA's PR is Really So BAD?! (in Promoting Pentax..)

Monday, November 01, 2010

WHY HOYA's PR is Really So BAD?! (in Promoting Pentax..)

I just wish to ask, Is and If their PR department really existent?

See this case, as reported by Simon Joinson, a reviewer of the DPR:-

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1000&message=36748834

View the topic of the post, "Where are all the reviews? They're coming!" But after you've read the full post. It should be: They are all coming, except the Pentax(es)!!

In fact, whilst Canon, Sony, Nikon, Olympus, Panasonic and Samsung have all already given their latest camera gear and models to DPR for testing and reviewing as told (Nikon's gear was expected to arrive by "today"..), there is just even not an expected date of delivery for the Pentax K-5 to the DPR. Simon just commented that it is still under "waiting" and it "won't be started for (within) a month", as obviously the Pentax K-5 will be the last one in the batch of all those new cameras for testing even when it will arrive later. In fact, DPR has not yet got any idea when it will come, even up till now! >:-[ Well, the K-5 was announced more than one month ago by Pentax and has already been marketed for two weeks! So, what's going on??!

Sometimes, what's happening just make me wonder.., IF Hoya *intentionally* delayed the delivery of a test unit to the DPR so that the review will be published later!? It is just because as there are K-5 units sold worldwide already and even there are so many new K-5 users have got their new units from the streets (market) into their hands already. As such, how difficult is the case for Hoya to send a production unit to the DPR for their testing and reviewing?? Not even to think about for making some better special arrangements to facilitate the review works of the DPR crew..

For such a company whose PR tasks (if any) are carried out in such an unbelievably sucking way, do you think that they will succeed? >:-x

I think that Hoya would have forgot that DPR is still the largest and most popular No.1 camera gear review site in the Internet on Earth. So, unless they are just being so afraid of that DPR will reveal some shortcomings of the K-5 that would look too unfavourable and will hurt their interests eventually, I simply can't think of a single reason why they should delay the delivery of the K-5 test unit and to make such a bad relationship with the DPR, in addition.

All in all, I believe that these kind of arrogance and ignorance of such an even large company like Hoya is just the stumbling block which hinders their succeed and indeed one of the true reasons that could really hurt their sales, even if they had some good products made to begin with! Really Sad..

Anyway, I knew that there is an email address of their "PR" department, which is a proof of their existence, frankly speaking and however. If you have a question to ask them, or have a complaint you want to write to them about Pentax or simply just a suggestion, you can still try to drop them an email. I hope that you would get a response, hopefully. Good luck, folks! ;-) If you really do that, you have made a nice trial and my thumb up in advance! :-D

HOYA-pr@mb.hoya.co.jp


Related:-

Ten Reasons for Thinking Twice before Decided on a K-5..

How a Company Respond Positively to Criticisms..

New Plans / Roadmaps of Others.. And Pentax?

1,000 Signatures of the Pentax SDM Petition Online!

Site Traffic of My Blog Matches 30% of that of the Dpreview on Pentax Contents

The Pentax Quality and Warranty Crises II

Comments (14)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
VladimirYo's avatar

VladimirYo · 749 weeks ago

I guess, PR Pentax want to have new firmware and then give it to press. It's normal. Stop panic, please =)
2 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
Hey man, have you read what Simon of the DPR had told? He said that he was still waaaiting for *the camera* and don't know when it would come, but not a firmware upgrade!!
DPREVIEW? Who cares about this strange site and strange reviews?
The site is belong to Adorama and sponsored by Canon and Nikon
VladimirYo's avatar

VladimirYo · 749 weeks ago

If I was Pentax, i would updete K5 with new firmware and then send it to dpreview with souvenirs. It's normal for PR, trust me.
1 reply · active 749 weeks ago
Yes, we all knew. But Hoya just did and have been doing the opposite! :-o :-(
俺キング、ネットで偉そに、威張っても、所詮はただの、レビューアー。
5 replies · active 749 weeks ago
Dpreview's Alexa Intenet website ranking is 965 as I have already checked. I don't think there exists any other media on Earth about photo gear that could have a comparable audience and reader base as the DPR, no matter it is printed or in electronic form.

Companies doing business with the same mentality of Hoya and yours was meant to be failed. As they could ignore those internet reviewing sites even for the largest, i.e., the DPR. Undoubtedly, the PR dept of Hoya is just doing a very worst job and they just failed to keep up with the modern trend for marketing and are just staying in the cave of the Stone Age!

Just see how Google and Facebook are of huge values nowadays, then people like you should re-think and face the reality.
DRPEVIEW has rather disputable methods of tests and absolutely absurd method of DR test. As for me -
It's interesting to read just about description of camera. The tests are absolutely useless.
Their testing methods are fine as long as they give high marks to Pentax. Same as DXO Mark. If Pentax scores well, everyone on DPR is quick to quote them.
Alexa Traffic Rank: 965. It's not bad for web-resource. But...This site is even not in TOP 500.
The opinion of Pentaxian is the best advertising for Pentax cameras.
965 for a camera site is huge. There are zillions of sites on news, politics, sex, porn, computers, cell phones, cars, sports, hobbies. So for a camera site to make it to 965 is pretty amazing. That means millions of people end up on that site every month.
Pentax is probably working on another firmware update or waiting for early adopters' problem reports to know what need to be fixed. This just shows that Pentax is not confident to release its product for review, but why then did it start selling them, if they are not good enough and may have problems? Did it do enough quality checks or was the camera rushed out, to be beta tested by the early adopters? Pathetic.
殿様に、献上すれば、売れるかも、ネット社会の封建制度
DPReview already have a K-5 on hand. Remember that their office is now in Seattle, Washington State, USA. My sources , straight from the top, informed me more than a week ago that DPreview had the K-5 on hand. I think it's a good thing that they review other brands now. What a shock when the K-5 beats them all. If the K-5 is tested last, it will remain the freshest review in the readers minds. You all know that Pentax is on it's way to the top, just as it was once. You'll see.

Post a new comment

Comments by