See:-
645D Vs K-5 Vs K-7
So, now I know that why "the K-5 is what everyone needs" and that hence there is simply no meaning of the 645D at all, as the RAW IQ is just the "same"! ;-D
And, just not to waste the remaining choice for the comparison, I selected also the K-7, which is the Pentax DSLR that scored the lowest mark as tested by the DxOLabs. The poor little K-7 really looks rather bad for this head-to-head direct comparison! :-(
Still waiting for the D7000 result, though. It would be interesting to see if the results would be more or less the same when the same sensor is used but without something in front of it that causes light loss. In the meantime, we can compare this:-
NEX-5 Vs K-5 Vs A55
Btw, just Welcome to the New King of APS-C DSLRs of the DxO BenchMark! :->
Still, for critical thinking for both sides of anything, do read this:-
Ten Reasons for Thinking Twice before Decided on a K-5..
Update (11-8): D7000's DxOMark is Out! I think the following would be the hottest comparison!
D7000 Vs K-5 Vs 60D
Well, as we can see, the results of the D7000 and K-5 are indeed very close. So, in fact, the "super IQ performance" of the K-5 is indeed a Sony achievement, but not particularly a Pentax one!
Read Also:-
K-r DxOMark and Yet Another ISO Test (Full Sized but Not Original)
K-r Vs K-x ISO Measurbations (Head to Head)
My K-r First Hands-ons (Tested Twice)
60D Vs D7000 Vs K-5: What Would You Acquire?
• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Saturday, November 06, 2010
K-5 Scores the Same DxOMark as the 645D!
標籤:
645D,
Colour Accuracy,
Image Quality,
K-5,
Live View,
Other Bodies,
Reviews,
Software
Comments (45)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
K-5 Scores the Same DxOMark as the 645D!
2010-11-06T00:18:00+08:00
RiceHigh
645D|Colour Accuracy|Image Quality|K-5|Live View|Other Bodies|Reviews|Software|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Falk Lumo · 749 weeks ago
j viviano · 749 weeks ago
jlahuer · 749 weeks ago
RH, you have managed to transform an extremely positive achievement of a Pentax camera in a rather negative entry in your blog...congratulations to you too !!!
WRK · 749 weeks ago
Richard · 749 weeks ago
Pretty awesome achievement for Pentax. Well done.
Burnieb · 749 weeks ago
Pascla De Pauw · 749 weeks ago
But still, this is the camera that will replace my Ist*D and makes me thinking about selling my Canon 1D3.
I think Pentax made the right decision dropping the Samsung sensor. I think this camera can be a winner if the can solve the some minor inconveniences through firmware. And they already fixed the RAW-buffer....hmmm.
jjabrams · 749 weeks ago
Amilcar · 749 weeks ago
Pentax offers few choices, of an unimpresive size but (at least to my taste) of great quality and ergonomics. It seems to me as if canikon where the equivalent to american cars, and pentax would be a citröen, odd, unasuming but surprisingly well thought.
I love my K10, Love my k7 (with it's no so good sensor and everything, anyway that's why my slowest lens is 2.8 and shoot in mostly good light), of course, I will get a K5 as soon as I can, hopefuly before the end of year, and it will bring me a new world of night photography with my beloved, fast and compact lenses...
That's what I call individuality...
Rice, by the way, I know you are secretly exited and saving for your own K5 and will ditch that 5D you used to love...
radiantlite 29p · 749 weeks ago
Luke · 749 weeks ago
Luke · 749 weeks ago
Teus · 749 weeks ago
When the K7 had bad dxomarks he was fond of it: http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2009/12/dxo-scores-c...
Please ricehigh post a new comparison if you dare :)
Toomas Kadarpik · 749 weeks ago
Erika · 749 weeks ago
Do not forget that dynamic range published on DxO vebsite is normalized for 8mp. Therefore any camera having less that 8mp will show less dynamic range than similar same camera with the same DR per megapixel, but having 8 or more megapixels.
K5 has bigger DR than K-x based on these tests, but lets not forget that K5 has 16.3 effective MP while k-x has only 12.4mp.
It would be interesting to know how they compare in DR per megapixel!
On other side this shows that consumer level Canon DSLR's DR is not very high, as for example 550D has 18.7 mp resolution, but in DR is behind some lower resolution cameras (like Nikon D90, D5000, Pentax k-r, k-x).
OGL · 749 weeks ago
skina · 749 weeks ago
buaobao · 749 weeks ago
Check it out , i did a little test using ISO-25,600 in dim ligthing of star ferry (TST). Am really excited to got out more, but am still busy that's why my photos are quite that few.
...buaobao
Wacko · 749 weeks ago
skina · 748 weeks ago
"purple fringing from the K-5 sensor" :-)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28177041@N03/5152110...
Dimitri · 748 weeks ago
(Low-Light ISO), whatever that means. So what? Does it translates into better IQ? Or handling? Or performance? Do you really believe you can get better technical IQ or more usable images shooting sports with K5 as with 7D? Or that K5 that better then 7D shooting landscapes?
The high ISO performance of K5 remains to be seen in systematic reviews. I have played a couple of days with Alpha 55V (same sensor as K5) and in real life in low light scenes i saw a lot of noise in shadows/blacks up 400 ISO. The keeper rate after shooting my 1 y.o. daughter in low light was considerably higher with my old 40D then with A55, so A55 goes back to the store...
teusrenes 48p · 748 weeks ago
So, in fact, the "super IQ performance" of the K-5 is indeed a Sony achievement, but not particularly a Pentax one!
</quote>
And IQ for a nikon dslr this is also solely due to the used sony sensor? c'mon ..