Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: A Late ISO Measurbation: 5D (Mark I) Vs 5D Mark II

Saturday, November 13, 2010

A Late ISO Measurbation: 5D (Mark I) Vs 5D Mark II

http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v313/RiceHigh/5Ds/

Testing Notes:-

1. 5D Settings: Standard Picture Style (Default 3, 0, 0, 0), AWB, Av Mode at f/8, Evaluative Metering, No Exposure Compensation, Large Fine JPEG, One Shot AF/Central AF Point, Standard High ISO NR;

2. 5D2 Settings: Standard Picture Style (Default 3, 0, 0, 0), AWB, Av Mode at f/8, Evaluative Metering, No Exposure Compensation, Large Fine JPEG, One Shot AF/Central AF Point, Standard High ISO NR, Highlight Tone Priority Disabled, Standard Auto Lighting Optimiser, Peripheral Illumination Correction Enabled (Unlike Pentax DSLRs, there is NO noticeable delay in processing after each shot! :-o);

3. Lens Used: EF 17-40/4 L, Focal Length Set at 28mm;

4. Click on any of the small thumbnails in the above page will open another picture page with a large picture of 3,999 pixels in length. To further download the original image, click under the "download" menu for a "high-res" image.

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
and?
ricehigh blog reader's avatar

ricehigh blog reader · 748 weeks ago

... and we can see, that 17-40/4L is poor on 5DII. Images from my 7D + tamron 17-50/2.8 VC have more detail and sharper corners than 5DII/17-40/L
2 replies · active 748 weeks ago
But do note that the Angle of View of the two above combos are different!
ricehigh blog reader's avatar

ricehigh blog reader · 748 weeks ago

You are right, but in this particular case, 40mm FF = 25 APS-C (so we can have the same angle). Mabye, if you take photo using some prime, or better zoom, the difference between 5D and 5DII will be more noticable (in case of resolution, not ISO)

Post a new comment

Comments by