Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: New (Small) Samples and Crops from the DA 18-135

Monday, November 22, 2010

New (Small) Samples and Crops from the DA 18-135


Above: Side-by-side Size Comparison for the New DA 18-135 Against the DAL 18-55 (a K-r "pink" colour kit lens is shown).

Our international expert internet poster FengweiXXX (aka FrankXXX, who is actually a Chinese dealer of Pentax at Singapore, IIRC) strikes again. Here is his first test on the DA 18-135, which is to be put on sales at November 26th at Japan, as previously announced.

Well, wait! Isn't that November 26th is the birthday of my Blog? Oh, Pentax/Hoya, thanks for the celebration and your birthday "gift"! ;-D

http://forum.xitek.com/sorthread.php?threadid=809323
(in Chinese, Google Translated English Page Here)

Small samples and crops for a few images taken at different focal lengths (lens stopped down) are shown. Image quality is not bad IMO but I just wish to remind you that that guy does not post any bad image with any Pentax gear ever. So, Beware! No matter how, the samples shown above are somehow impressive, at least on the first glance, as always for Frank's samples! ;-) Thumb up, Frank! You're my Hero! ;-D

p.s. Frank usually shoot RAW and I found that he has very good skills in Post Possessing and is much knowledgeable in the use of those conversion software. Do note also the heavy sharpening applied and halo/artifacts that can be found in his crops, anyway.

Update (11-25): More (small) samples were uploaded by Frank, see:-

Hands-on w/ SMC DA 18-135mm/3.5-5.6 Lens (Many Photos)

Well, while the samples are not bad in general (as usual, as I've said), I yet can see some rather heavier sharpening applied than my like.


More:-


(Alexa) Traffic Ranking of Pentax-Theme Websites

Site Traffic of My Blog Matches 30% of that of the Dpreview on Pentax Contents

DAL 35/2.4 and DA 18-135/3.5-5.6 Full Size Samples

DA 18-135 First Photo Samples

Does the New DA 18-135 just Look Too Close to the Nikkor Counterpart? :-o

Comments (5)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Yes, if Pentax images are any good, it is because "that that guy does not post any bad image with any Pentax gear ever"... now, if the images were crappy, it'd be because of the camera. I sure am glad you're fighting for objectivity...

It is funny, how you first praise his converion skills and then immediately tell about the heavy sharpening artifacts. If someone converts images leaving strong artifacts, his conversion skills are not worth praising. But I guess anything goes for the biased mind...
3 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
I am seriously considering to buy the 18-135, despite that it doubles the (close) prices of the 18-135 of both Canon and Nikon, are you too? Just curious to know..
No. I shoot with vintage (m42) glass, though I may buy a modern wide angle as APS-C has it's limits with old glass.

Interesting how your comment I'm replying to has already got two "thumbs up" even though it has basicly no value for anyone... makes me wonder if you now give yourself both thumbs up when you post :)
I didn't know that Canon and Nikon's are WR too....wow..... >.<
CHIP magazine? Right........

Post a new comment

Comments by