Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog

Saturday, February 05, 2011

SAFOX IX Tungsten/Yellow Light Front Focus Issue Fully Investigated

Background

Since K-r and K-5 have been marketed, many Pentax users have been complaining about the obvious Front Focus (FF) issue resulted when using these cameras, when they were shooting at lower light and more so under tungsten light source, actually. A recent report here.

In fact, this "Yellow Light FF Symptom" was with Pentax users for long since Pentax made their first DSLR, the *ist D. But I did find that the problem was not as severe as before since Pentax had made the K-m and with the two successive models of the K-7 and K-x, too. But rather unfortunately, with the K-r, it seems that this issue strikes again and more of those adverse reports arose, which was also confirmed shortly after a few days use of my new K-r! :-(

So, I decided to do yet another controlled experiment, to compare the old SAFOX VII of my MZ-S, the SAFOX VIII (latest version) of my K-x and the SAFOX IX (first version) of the K-r:-



Test Methodology

1. The focus target is as below. It comprises of a stair case of 3 flat surfaces. The centre one is the main target, which has a good contrasty pattern, and is used for the AF, with the central single focus point of the cameras, in AF-S mode.



2. Each of the camera body is then mounted on a sturdy tripod. The light source is changed between Yellow and White, photos are taken and then where the final focus arrives in the final image per picture is observed. The lens focus/distance scale for the final focus measure is also recorded, for each picture.

3. The shutter release button is re-pressed for a few times until there is no re-focusing/hunting and that the camera believes firmly that its decided AF focus is correct.

4. Other testing notes and conditions: FA 43/1.9 Limited in Av mode at f/2.0, ISO 200, SR off, AF Single, Central AF point, AWB, latest firmware in K-r and last latest firmware in K-x.

The Results

Camera
Recorded Image
Lens' Distance
MZ-S / White Light Source
N/A

MZ-S / Yellow Light Source
N/A

K-x / White Light

K-x / Yellow Light
K-r (AF Fine Adj Off) / White Light
K-r (AF Fine Adj Off) / Yellow Light
K-r (AF Fine Adj On, at Max. Value of -10) / White Light

K-r (AF Fine Adj On, at Max. Value of -10) / Yellow Light

Observations and Conclusions

1. Both K-x and K-r (*without* focus adjust) are fairly accurate with white light source.

2. Under yellow light source, the K-x focus shifts forward and too with the K-r. But the span of the shift of the K-x is considerably less than that of the K-r. As a result, the K-x' picture is still somehow acceptable even it is front focused. On the other hand, the K-r picture under yellow light is totally out of focus for the target owing to the serious front focusing. This is verified from the lens' focus scale readings in the above the four respective pictures, too.

3. With focus adjust at -10 for the K-r, now it focuses more correctly under yellow light, but then it then causes obvious back focusing in white light. Again, the span between white and yellow light is large, although it is not as large as when the focus adjust is off.

4. The MZ-S / SAFOX VII is affected least by the yellow light with minimal effect. By looking at the focus scale, it matches well with the best focus pictures under white light for the K-x and K-r.

Afterall, how does that ten years old SAFOX VII still outperform both the last version of SAFOX VIII and now the latest SAFOX of IX (but which is now the worst!)? How come Pentax yet once again has sucked quality from the SAFOX IX, which they had already improved it to avoid the problem somehow with the latest revision of the SAFOX VIII?? :-o

And since I purchased the K-r to upgrade but not downgrade, its more serious yellow light FF symptom than the K-x really upset me. And this is for sure a big disappointment - I did not expect the K-r could be and should be worse than the K-x! >:-[

Remedials, then?

1. Use the LiveView to focus, the LV CDAF is not affected by the yellow light, last time I checked and verified. But with LV, of course it has its problem and limitations, such as no OVF could be used and the prolonged shutter lag (the shutter will be fired twice before a picture is taken).

2. Manually change the focus adjust setting each time for Yellow or White light source (do remember to set the memory function for the last accessed menu item to avoid more troubles if you do this! And do remember to check frequently to avoid "user error"!!).

But of course, the pre-requisite for you for doing this is that you must first have an accurate K-r in AF which requires no -ve focus adjust by default in the very beginning, just like mine. Otherwise, you will never be able to enter the required amount of (the -ve) correction if you have already used up some of the quota, just in case - which could happen with the "excellent" QC of Pentax nowadays.


Read Also:-

How AF Errors Can Decrease *Effective* Resolution?

Friday, February 04, 2011

Pentax Losing Momentum in Japan?

I'm afraid that the observation of this Pentaxian is right..

http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/130967-pentax-losing-momentum-japan.html

I have just checked, Pentax is still not doing well for the latest BCN ranking as in the last week of January:-

http://bcnranking.jp/category/subcategory_0008.html

Best Pentax result is the K-5 + DA 18-135 kit set, which is only ranked at No. 40. :-(

More "NC-1" (the Pentax Mirrorless) Rumours

First, Photo Rumors said to get an unverifiied pixelised small image of it:-


http://photorumors.com/2011/02/03/pentax-nc-1-mirrorless-camera/

And then, the Mirrorless Rumors write that it is a 5.6X cropped sensor camera with just a P&S DC sensor which is shared with Kenko for their upcoming mirrorless. The NC-1 will be announced in May with two interchangeable lens..

http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/pentax-mirrorless-system-with-ultratiny-sensor-5x/

Of course, a new lens mount will be used. It is just impossible to use even the old Auto 110 mount which is too ancient and has no modern feature of any, neither even an auto aperture.



Anyway, if it is true, just don't have any expectation about the IQ of the new Pentax mirrorless. It is just an interchangeable lens P&S "system" after all! :-(

But I just wish to ask, why not buy a prosumer/superzoom DC then?? Are changing lens and getting dust on sensor just having so much fun?? :-o

Tuesday, February 01, 2011

Very Wild Rumours: Pentax K-2 and New Body Announcement on Feb. 8th



See this:-

http://cgi.ebay.ca/New-Battery-PENTAX-D-LI109-DLI109-K-R-K-2-KR-K2-SLR-/360333677532?pt=Batteries_Chargers&hash=item53e58f93dc

via Xitek Forum Here (Simplified Chinese, machine-translated English Page Here).

It is also said that there will soon be an announcement for a new Pentax DSLR or even EVIL(ILDC) on February 8th, which from my best sensible guess, should be the K-5 Silver but not anything else, if the rumour is to be true.

After all, remember these are rumours. And they are very wild ones.

Update: K-2 should not exist, K-2 is simply K-r in Mandarin!

Important K-7 Debug Mode Activation Note

Is that the user should open the SD card door instead of closing it! Otherwise, it won't work:

http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=986059&extra=page%3D1
(Traditional Chinese, machine-translated English page here)

So, someone may point out and would ask (as already in the above thread), the K-7/5 have the focus correction function built-in already, from -10 to +10, why bother then? The reason as answered by two different K-7 users in the above thread is that, "It is just not enough, the error is just more than that and beyond!" :-o :-(

As for my new K-r, I now face the same situation. The lucky thing is that my K-r's AF is reasonably accurate under sunlight and white light source, but when under tungsten, even a -10 correction factor is not enough but yet I don't know how to enter the Debug mode for the K-r! Really too bad!! >:-{

Btw and in fact, my K-x suffers less from the "Yellow Light Symptom" than the K-r. I shall show you folks why and how with a simple experiment together with some illustrations later on when I have the time! Stay tuned!


Related:-

http://www.google.com/search?q=Debug+Mode&btnG=Find&domains=ricehigh.blogspot.com&sitesearch=ricehigh.blogspot.com


AF Accuracy's Dependency on Lenses and Yellow Light

K-5 Low Light Front Focusing Issue - The SAFOX *Plus* System Simply Does NOT Work at all!

Is the AF Accuracy of Pentax K-5/K-r Really So Bad?

Inside the Nikon D7000: The K-5 Sensor is There! ;-)

The Sony IMX071:-



From: http://www.chipworks.com/en/technical-competitive-analysis/resources/recent-teardowns/2011/01/teardown-of-the-nikon-d7000-dslr/

Quoted:-

"Sony IMX071

The Nikon D7000 comes equipped with a DX format (APS-C) sensor fabricated by Sony, the IMX071. With a 16.2 Mp resolution, this is the second highest resolution of any Nikon DSLR, behind the 24 Mp D3X (dpreview.com). This image sensor features a pixel size of 4.8 µm x 4.8 µm (as seen in the Bayer patterned RGB color filters). The sensor displays improvements in pixel layout and process features, as compared to previous generations of Sony DSLR sensors."


Read Also:-

The Secrets of the K10D (Part 1 of 3) - The Heart: The CCD

The Secrets of the K10D (Part 2 of 3) - The Bridge: The ADC

The Secrets of the K10D (Part 3 of 3) – The Brain: The IPU

Repair a Stuck SDM DIY - An English Guide



After reading my last article about the big discovery of DIY SDM repairing, our Blog reader "sveinmb" has compiled a full repair guide in English, after he successfully repaired a stuck SDM himself, here it is:-

http://bangmedia.no/pentax/sdmfix/

What I have to say is that the guide is clear and appropriately detailed. Nice done, Sveinmb!

Saturday, January 29, 2011

More K-r Colour Matching..

The Pentax sole agent of Taiwan is now offering (charged) grip replacement service for K-r users at Taiwan.. (Subsequent to what Hoya Japan offered grip replacement service for the K-x for Japanese users previously. Similar free service was also offered as part of the K-x promotion campaign in which limited grip colours can be chosen in specific purchasing period, once in Hong Kong, too.)



Source: http://forum.pentaxfans.net/showthread.php?t=108073 (in Traditional Chinese)

I really like this K-r Burger Thief! :-D



Source: http://forum.pentaxfans.net/showthread.php?t=107521 (in Traditional Chinese)

K-r Gold/Brown Limited Pentax Lens Matching

Further to the unboxing of my new Gold/Brown K-r #107, as before, I've done some Pentax lens matching with the new body, which are shown as follows:-

DAL 35/2.4 Gold:-


"A":-


"F":-


"F*":-


"FA":-


"FA*":-


"FA Limited Silver":-


"FA2":-


"FAJ":-


"DA/DA Limited":-


"DFA":-



View Also:-

Lens Matching with the Navy K-x

Friday, January 28, 2011

K-r AF Point (Mode) Selection Firmware Bug

Soon I'd powered up my new K-r Limited, I could see now there was the red AF point illumination indication again. But when I wanted to change the AF point mode via the main status menu with the Ok button, it had no effect! :-o :-(

If you are not sure about what I am talking about, look at the following diagrams. Left is the main status menu, upon the press of the Ok button, it should change to the selection menu as in the right:-



I then safely concluded that it was just a firmware bug! To verify it, I picked out my K-x to check but there was not the same problem found!!

I just couldn't believe there would be such an obvious bug in the "production" firmware. I thought that this trivial bug should have been removed "silently" with the latest firmware. So, I immediately downloaded the latest K-r firmware 1.01, which has just been officially released, at the Pentax Japanese support site. But it doesn't work out at all, i.e., the bug is still there! >:-(

I think I shall soon write an email to Hoya via their Japanese email contact to report this bug. Otherwise, I am afraid that this annoying bug will never be cured, just like what happened to the K-m for its sensor cleaning bug, which is indeed a serious one (which erases all user settings) and in fact affects every K-m user!

At the end of the day, K-r is an "improved" version of the K-x with the AF red dot indication which is all about the selection of the AF point. But now that direct and quick access to the AF point mode is jeopardised and the Ok button has NO function against what is indicated in the status screen! So? :-o

Nevertheless, I bet that Hoya Japan will continue to ignore me all in all even I once contact them again. So, if you are a K-r user, DO report this bug to your local Pentax and hopefully when more users have reported, Hoya Japan would be pushed to debug the firmware and give us a new update - Yes, hopefully! Let's ACT NOW!!

Update (1-29):-

I checked last night against my K-x for the existing differences and think about the root cause of them. It was found that it is just all about the way how the cameras (K-r and K-x) are differed when they are used to choose the AF point *manually* under the "Select" mode.

Anyhow, it is confirmed that it is not a bug. But it is really way misleading to show the icons and layout (of the four-way plus Ok buttons) but which the Ok button now has no function of any except in the Select mode and it cannot be used to change the AF point mode, unlike it used to be in the K-x.

My suggestion is even now the Select mode is using the Ok button, why not re-activate the Ok button again for other modes, namely, single central AF point, Auto 5 points and Auto 11 points. Just in case if the "Select" focus point mode is entered, the user could still enter the Info or main menu to change back the setting, as of it is now - end of story. If the user does not use the Select mode usually, this will improve the operation a lot!

And, as for Hoya, they have not responded so far, and I bet they never will! >:-| This is against what most other companies I have ever sent in an enquiry, suggestion or bug report. They usually responded and appreciated much the valuable feedback from the customer, and politely! Pentax/Hoya is the rare company that I have ever seen who had such a poor attitude, and it has never been changed! >>:-\