Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: Pancake "Standard" Prime Shootout: FA 43/1.9 Limited Vs A 50/2

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Pancake "Standard" Prime Shootout: FA 43/1.9 Limited Vs A 50/2



These two lenses are similar in focal and speed, size and weight (both about 150g). The focals are "standard" on film SLRs but now on Pentax DSLRs, they have become short tele something. The A lens is actually much looking like the black Limiteds in appearance, which actually copy the look and aesthetic design from the A lenses. The Pentax A 50/2 was sold at HK$350 in 1995 when it was discontinued. Now, the FA 43/1.9 Limited is lately being sold at approximately HK$6,200 at the streets of Hong Kong, which is 17.7 times(!) for the cost difference without taking inflation into account. And, the current exchange rate of 1 US$ equals to 7.8 HK$, for reference.

My this shootout will show you how these lenses are different and mine are about ten-year and twenty-year old respectively.

Infinity Scene:-
Aperture
FA 43/1.9 Limited
A 50/2
f/2

f/2.8
f/4
f/5.6
f/8
f/11
(Click to Download Large Images, a New Tab/Window will be opened)

Some observations of mine:-

1. The A lens produces warmer tone (which is more faithful to the real scene) whilst the Limited is yet a bit cooler;

2. The Limited lens is a bit more contrasty;

3. IQ wise, the Limited is acceptable at f/2.8 and good at f/4 (for both centre and corners). f/11 is still good but f/8 is just slightly better;

4. IQ wise, the A lens is marginally acceptable at f/2.8 (with more corner blur and the centre is not sharp enough) and good to very good at f/4 to f/5.6 (for both centre and corners). Both f/8 and f/11 are excellent and actually are even a bit sharper than the 43 Limited.

Long Distance (Not Infinity):-

Aperture
FA 43/1.9 Limited
A 50/2
f/2
f/2.8
f/4
f/5.6
f/8
f/11

Some observations of mine:-

1. Contrasts are more or less the same this time for both lenses;

2. Flare control of the limited lens is better from f/2.8 and onwards and in contrast, that of the A lens is poor until f/4;

3. IQ wise, the Limited is acceptable at f/2.8 and good at f/4 (for both centre and corners). f/11 is nice but is not as good as f/8, possibly owing to diffraction limit reached;

4. IQ wise, the A lens is only somehow acceptable at f/4 (still with slight corner blur and ghost image starts to disappear, but not totally). IQ becomes good at f/5.6 (for both centre and corners). I regard f/2 and f/2.8 are practically not much usable under that situation as ghosting and soft image rendition are real and obvious problems. Both f/8 and f/11 are still excellent, though, fortunately.

Near Distance and Bokeh:-

Aperture
FA 43/1.9 Limited
A 50/2
f/2

f/2.8
f/4
f/5.6
f/8

My observations for this? Well, I think it would be better for you to observe and judge this time, as a homework and exercise for learning how to be a qualified measurbator! ;-)

Test Notes:-

1. Single AF mode is used for FA 43, MF according to AF Indication for the A 50;

2. Av Mode, ISO 100, Matrix Metering, No Exposure Compensation, on Tripod, 2 sec Timer, SR Off;

3. Auto White Balance, Portrait Custom Image with Factory Default Parameters, EXIF data preserved;

4. All pictures are resized to 3,999 pixels in width. To download the original un-retouched full size images, you need to go to my following Photobucket album to select the option and download:-

http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v313/RiceHigh/K-x_Review/Standard_Prime_Shootout/?start=all


Read Also:-

RiceHigh's Subjective Ratings on Pentax AF Lenses on Pentax DSLRs 2010

Standard Zoom Mega Shootout! (DA Vs FAJ Vs DAL Vs SA Vs FA!)

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Michael A.'s avatar

Michael A. · 784 weeks ago

Great shootout RH. The pinkish color rendering of your 43 is not happening with my "black liner cap" sample (as you would have a skylight on it instead of UV as you do). Through my filters (eyes) color goes to A50, sharpness/contrast (little advantage to shorter FL) & bokeh to 43... Take care "navy k-x brother"! :o)
3 replies · active 784 weeks ago
My 43 has been bought for ten years and is surely also a "black liner cap" one! :-) I use an (somehow) expensive Heliopan MC UV filter on it which has very good transparency and neutral colour. I needed to protect my that Limited lens that is now about 18 times more costly than my "cheapo" SMC-A pancake, which I use it bare, right? ;-)
Michael A.'s avatar

Michael A. · 784 weeks ago

Absolutely, UV or Skylight filter is a must. I use Heliopan or B+W only (17 layers SH-PMC or MRC or the standard kind as well). Pentax special and often pricey glass surely deserves it. Any glass around 50mm is good, since it's considered an "easy & simple" to design and produce. As for your A50, perhaps the filter would cost more than the lens... :o)

The obvious older purplish coating seems present only first couple of years. It could be a pre-Ghostless coating when compared to my newer FA35 (1997 vs 1999 release years). Perhaps someone visiting here can competently explain the difference.

Thanks much again, it's a good fun to compare "gems"! BTW, the new canikon forum does look kind of cheesy indeed....
You're welcome, Michael and I'm glad that you like my tests! :-)

As for the UV protectors, B+W MRC is the best that I like most and actually I prefer it over the Heliopan SH-PMC. Both are really expensive, though, especially in recent years. For the best cost on performance, Hoya HMC is still the way to go (ditto Kenko ordinary MC UV filters).

Post a new comment

Comments by