Have a look at the above test. The test is clearly described and the results are self-explanatory. See:-

So, it can be quite safely concluded from the above that the mirror slap is an issue for the K-5 and it causes obvious blur in the final images, especially when a longer focal length is used. And, against what Pentax camera operation manuals always advise for turning off the SR when mounting the camera on a tripod, turning on the SR could reduce the effect somehow, but however the problem and the adverse effect is still not totally eliminated, unless the mirror is locked up.
Do note that it is the mirror slap that causes blur but not the shutter vibration, otherwise even locking up the mirror cannot help.
All in all, the K-5 has a higher pixel count for an APS-C DSLR, but without a more accurate focusing system and a more gentle mirror slap that cause less vibration, most of the effective resolution of the sensor is actually wasted and the image quality suffers. And, if the higher fps is the cause of all those mirror slap problems for the latest Pentax DSLRs (i.e., K-7, K-x, K-5 and K-r), I would rather have a 3 fps rate in the old days for all those Pentax digital bodies! >:-[
TTB · 737 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 737 weeks ago
Don · 737 weeks ago
Use a pelicile mirror in place of the standard mirror and shoot through the mirror for video and make a user selectable function whether to flip or lock the mirror up, or shoot through it...
Japanese · 737 weeks ago
rhermans · 737 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 737 weeks ago
Leschi · 737 weeks ago
You should know this: http://falklumo.blogspot.com/2010/12/lumolabs-pen...
BTW: At the 645D it's the same. You can't make sharp, clear pictures slower than 1/100s.
I will now use more the mirror-up function in future under some circumstances ;)
RiceHigh 110p · 737 weeks ago
Mage · 737 weeks ago
More seriously, given all the problems with this, can't Pentax just get a shutter from somebody else, e.g. Sony? If it can get Sony sensors and probably some other parts from other manufacturers, why not this ^&%# shutter that caused so much headache? and maybe some motor drive from others, like Sigma or Tamron, for its lenses? And in fact anything mechanical, since its QC is so poor?
Michael A. · 737 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 737 weeks ago
Michael A. · 737 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 737 weeks ago
H-he · 737 weeks ago
The thread title is misleading. Please, take the fact into account that the 2s timer doesn't delay exposure from the shutter.
RiceHigh 110p · 737 weeks ago
Arno · 737 weeks ago
Don't you read the doc ?
RiceHigh 110p · 736 weeks ago