As a New Year Gift, I have this measurbation shootout, with all full sized original samples directly out of the cameras posted, as below!
The shootout was carried out at almost the same time, for the same target at the same distance, with (almost) the same lighting condition (diffused daylight indoor). The cameras were mounted on a sturdy tripod, shutter fired with IR remote controller (for K-x) or cable switch (for 5D). Other key essential shooting information as follows. And of course, full EXIF data preserved:
- Pentax K-x with FA 31/1.8 Limited (Effective Film Focal/AOV: 47.6mm), Av Exposure Mode at f/8, Single AF Mode Focusing on the Centre, Finest JPEG, "Bright" Custom Image Mode, Default Settings 0, 0, 0, 1, 1 for Saturation, Hue, High/Low Key Adj, Contrast and *Fine* Sharpness, Auto White Balance, Evaluative Metering, Exposure Compensation +0.5EV, High ISO NR Starting from ISO 800 and Up at Medium (Factory Default), SR Off;
- Canon 5D with EF 50/1.8II, Av Exposure Mode at f/8, Single AF Mode Focusing on the Centre, Finest JPEG, "Portrait Snapshot" Picture Style, Default Settings 3, 0, 0, 0 for Sharpness, Contrast, Saturation and Hue, Auto White Balance, Evaluative Metering, No Exposure Compensation;
Do note that it's my sole intention to keep the colour response, exposure and sharpening etc. as close as possible for the two cameras, so that a more useful and meaningful shootout and comparisons can be achieved.
ISO | K-x | 5D |
50 | Not Available | ![]() |
100 | ![]() | ![]() |
200 | ![]() | ![]() |
400 | ![]() | ![]() |
800 | ![]() | ![]() |
1600 | ![]() | ![]() |
3200 | ![]() | ![]() |
6400 | ![]() | Not Available |
12800 | ![]() | Not Available |
Remarks:-
1. Click on any of the Thumbnails will download Large Files in size near 12MPs each;
2. If you still want to view original un-retouched full sized sample, see them here (under the "download" option, select "high res image").
Well, I don't comment anything this time on all the IQ performance, exposure accuarcy and focusing accuracy etc. YOU are the one who measurbate, observe, compare and re-measurbate again, inspect and make up your own conclusions this time! (could be endlessly until the end of the days, forever! ;-D)
P.S. and Acknowledgement: My Special Thanks to Fred, who is a regular reader here, for kindly lending me his K-x with his FA 31 Limited (Vietnam made version), for doing this test. And, a Full Review with Tips and Tricks (and my Recommended Best Settings) for the K-x will follow, at a later stage.
Read Also:-
K-m Olive Vs 5D Pixel Peeping
K-7 Vs 5D Pixel Peeping
K-x Vs K-m ISO Measurbation
My K-m Review, Tips and Tricks
Bob · 796 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 796 weeks ago
1001noisycamera 98p · 795 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 795 weeks ago
As for the term "measurbation", it is derived from the word "measurbator", which was created by our Master Ken Rockwell !
Michael A. · 796 weeks ago
The FA31, 43 and 77mm FF lenses are really awesome. I'm lucky to have all 3 (& K-x) but still Made in Japan... :o) Have a great 2010 as well!!!
P.S. Landscape color setting on K-x looks best to me on most occasions...
Fred · 796 weeks ago
However, I see more texture with the K-x and the chroma noise is better.
I look forward to your further tests!
Anu · 795 weeks ago
I don't like either images.
Voe · 795 weeks ago
TheGuest(TM) · 795 weeks ago
Daniel · 795 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 795 weeks ago
HiJoe · 795 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 795 weeks ago
de lageneste · 795 weeks ago
Slightly sharper K-x images (higher shapening?).
Less chroma noise in K-x images (better NR algorithms, the 5D jpeg engine is showing its age).
Complete detail obliteration in the red tones on K-x images (better NR yes, but completely messes up anything red...?)
Presence of heavy Moiré patterns on the 5D images (very light LP filter).
My suggestion:
Just redo the same comparison test in raw with Rawtherapee and everything set to default if you want to do any real IQ comparison.
My conclusion:
The K-x is probably very close to the 5D if not better above ISO 3200 (absence of banding that limits the 5D to ISO 3200 for all practical purposes).
When shot in raw, the 5D still has about 1 stop better high ISO noise and will show marginally better details at the expense of frequent Moiré patterns on fine meshed fabrics.
jerzees · 782 weeks ago
Bill Merritt · 769 weeks ago
Vasya · 754 weeks ago