
Here is my latest measurbation! :-D
Shooting conditions:-
1. 5D3+EF24/1.4L II, Latest Firmware (1.1.2), All Factory Default Settings (Picture Style Standard 3, 0, 0, 0), Auto White Balance, Av Exposure Mode at f/8, Evaluative Metering with No Exp. Comp., One-shot AF / Central AF point, Large Fine JPEG;
2. NEX-3+E16/2.8, Firmware Ver. 04, Landscape Creative Style 0, 0, 0 (Standard mode is too pale, otherwise all other settings are defaults), Auto White Balance, Av Exposure Mode at f/8, Evaluative Metering with No Exp. Comp., Single AF / Central AF point, Large Fine JPEG.
Images of both cameras are resized to 3,999/4,000 pixels in width and are linked below, click any of the following to download and view the specific large-sized picture:-
5D3 | NEX-3 |
200 | 200 |
400 | 400 |
800 | 800 |
1600 | 1600 |
3200 | 3200 |
Still, if you want to access and assess the original un-retouched samples, you can go here:-
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v313/RiceHigh/5Ds/5D3_Vs_NEX-3_ISO/
Furthermore, ISO shootout pictures for the 5D3 against the K-5 from ISO 100 to 25600 will be published shortly! The shootout is made with my standard "bird" targets in an indoor environment. :-D
Denis · 671 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 671 weeks ago
My test meant to be a comparison of the biggest/heaviest against the smallest/lightest lens interchangeables (almost for both), of the same FoV. Sure there is difference in IQ, but how big is it?
If you still think that it is stupid, the two ISO tests can still be viewed independently, can't they?
kai · 671 weeks ago
Art · 671 weeks ago
Ivan · 671 weeks ago