Scene 1:-
Aperture | E16 on NEX-3 | DA16-45 on K-r |
f/4 | ![]() | ![]() |
f/5.6 | ![]() | ![]() |
f/8 | ![]() | ![]() |
f/11 | ![]() | ![]() |
Scene 2:-
Aperture | E16 on NEX-3 | DA16-45 on K-r |
f/4 | ![]() | ![]() |
f/5.6 | ![]() | ![]() |
f/8 | ![]() | ![]() |
f/11 | ![]() | ![]() |
Some observations:-
For the DA16-45..
1. Optimal centre resolution achieved near f/5.6 and up to f/8 (far objects are resolved better than closer objects for smaller apertures). And, f/11 is worse than f/4 owing to diffraction, possibly;
2. Corner sharpness is not good for all apertures. In general, with the increased DoF, the corner sharpness could be improved somehow and resolution is more in line with the centre at f/8 and f/11.
For the E16..
3. Optimal centre resolution achieved near f/5.6 and up to f/8 (far objects are resolved better than closer objects for smaller apertures). And, f/11 is much worse than f/4 owing to diffraction, possibly and for some other factors as well;
4. Corner sharpness is fairly good for all apertures. In general, with the increased DoF, the corner sharpness could be improved somehow and resolution is more in line with the centre at f/8 and f/11.
In Comparison..
5. The optimal centre resolutions of the DA16-45 and the E16 are pretty close, close to f/5.6 and up to f/8;
6. The corner sharpness of the E16 is better than that of the DA16-45 regardless of aperture used;
7. The f/11 of the E16 could be worse than the f/11 of the DA16-45, whereas the f/4 of the E16 is similar to the f/4 of the DA16-45 (putting aside the inferior corner sharpness of the DA lens);
8. The E16 has even more noticeable CAs than the already famous-for-the-CA DA16-45 lens! :-o (This is possibly caused by the high incident angle of light falling onto the sensor of the NEX (of which the back register distance of the E-mount is very short in 18mm);
9. The colour rendition of the Pentax system is somehow more faithful and pleasing as a whole package! (No matter how I tuned the NEX, I could NOT get better colours than what I can get from the Pentax system! :-( And, I should crank up the saturation of the K-r for one step for a closer match, though.)
Previous Related:-
NEX-3 Vs K-x Full ISO Shootout (Controlled Test)
My Ten Reasons to Buy the NEX-3 Over the NEX-5! :-)
Sony NEX-5 VS Pentax K-x ISO/IQ Shootout (Dual Scenes)
Sony NEX-5 and NEX-3 Hands-on Impressions / Quick Review
Orky · 730 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 730 weeks ago
Flo · 730 weeks ago
How about comparing the NEX's 16mm versus the DA 15ltd ?
ATK · 730 weeks ago
Flo · 730 weeks ago
Now, if you want to compare per price, you either need to compare it to the DA 18-55 or the DA 35 f/2.4.
The latter sells form $200 vs $250 for the Sony and the DA is MUCH sharper at all apertures (almost tack sharp at f/2.4).
RiceHigh 110p · 730 weeks ago
http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2009/08/expensive-le...
Btw, the DA15 in my city is not sold at "twice the price" of a E16. The cost difference is six times! The E16 is really very cheap to be bought as a kit, whilst the DA15 is really rare and expensive.
I might still buy it later though, maybe at the B&H which sells it cheapest, at around $550, for most of the time.
Art · 729 weeks ago
Flo · 730 weeks ago
adonishong · 730 weeks ago
DragonKiwi · 729 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 729 weeks ago