

The following shots were made with the above two DA lenses on my MZ-S with Fuji Superia 200 film on a bright day and film-scanned in about 6 megapixels. Here they are:-
DA(L) 35/2.4 | DA 70/2.4 Limited |
f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
f/4 | f/4 |
f/5.6 | f/5.6 |
f/8 | f/8 |
f/11 | f/11 |
So, it is proven that both lenses are 100% Full Frame compatible. As for the optical performance (versus problems) at different apertures, it'd better for you to go measurebate and find these out by yourself! :-)
Related:-
Compatibility of DA Lenses on Full Frame
frank d · 696 weeks ago
Good seeing you taking some photos...That city looks so big.
RiceHigh 110p · 696 weeks ago
As for those test *samples*, once again they were created just for the sake of testing, not really anything I wanted to take as "photos" by themselves! :-)
Hong Kong might be a big (or should be crowded) city, the above samples show only a small part of it. For some of my previous photos showing both sides of the Victoria harbour (i.e., the urban areas), you can take a look at:-
http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2010/11/over-hong-ko...
jlahuer · 696 weeks ago
Well, your images at f2.8 and even f4 show a 'bit' of vignetting, I would say...
But yes, the lens can mount and shot, that's true.
RiceHigh 110p · 696 weeks ago
http://www.photozone.de/canon_eos_ff/516-canon35f...
Walt · 696 weeks ago
aurele · 695 weeks ago
But that's a good thing to know that the 70/2.4 is FF compatible :) now i just wonder if i need the half stop of the FA77 ;-)
John · 694 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 694 weeks ago