Tried it at the Sony showroom and then immediately decided to buy a K-5! ;-D
1. Not too big and heavy and is comfortable to hold.
2. Build quality is nice, body felt solid, except the flash.
2. Built-in flash is rather flimsy, especially when it is popped up or during being opened. Closed flash still has some slight play which I don't like (against what every K-5's closed tightly)!
3. Shutter lag is more noticeable than my NEX-3, i.e., double shutter actuation is indeed noticeable and can be heard.
4. Image saving requires rather long time per picture. (Unsure if it saved RAW+ but the waiting time is really rather longish!)
5. The Tri-Navi operation system and interface is difficult to use! At least I couldn't adapt to it on the first run! I hate that the selection range is long for the parameters but there is no facility and any means to reset the value and do the homing.
6. Don't have any high expectation on the EVF! No matter what it is stated on paper, it is YET an EVF! Refresh rate, dynamic range, colour rendition and accuracy are all old problems!
I didn't test on the IQ, as I only had one spare SD card with me but which I brought for use in testing my new K-5 which I wanted to buy and I did not want to take the risk of messing up the image file numbers. But anyway, after the above quick test and play, the NEX-7 was already kicked out of my wish list and in fact it is about (US)$130 dearer than a K-5.
• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Sunday, January 22, 2012
Comments (37)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
NEX-7 Brief Hands-on Impressions
2012-01-22T13:33:00+08:00
RiceHigh
Build Quality|Flashes|ILDCs|K-5|Other Bodies|Prices|System Performance|User Friendliness|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Catalana · 688 weeks ago
justmy2cents · 688 weeks ago
OGL · 688 weeks ago
The one moment - DO REMEMBER - AF is not much better than previous cameras from Pentax. My K200D is not worse in terms of accurancy.
K-5 is just bit faster and better to catch sometimes.
iToobz · 688 weeks ago
I love the camera though and if I thought that Pentax were no longer going to be making DSLR's I'd buy another. . .
Hope you enjoy yours!
deadbird · 688 weeks ago
This would be great news, as it would mean camera companies can then focus on other elements of the camera than the sensor. Of course instead working on light field technology or improving HDR more, I am guessing 3D and 4k will get looked at more.
Cold · 688 weeks ago
You should have turned on the electronic first shutter from the menu -- that drops the shutter lag down to 20 ms
See
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/NEX7/NEX7A6...
Cold · 688 weeks ago
K-5 scores 82, Nex-7 scores 81, and D7000 scores 80
5 points equal 1/3 difference, so these 1 to 2 points differences are basically zero.
Simon · 688 weeks ago
Say What · 688 weeks ago
Guest · 688 weeks ago
Guest · 688 weeks ago
Guest2 · 688 weeks ago
Guest · 688 weeks ago
Kosta · 688 weeks ago
· 688 weeks ago
Lpix · 688 weeks ago
"6. Don't have any high expectation on the EVF! No matter what it is stated on paper, it is YET an EVF! Refresh rate, dynamic range, colour rendition and accuracy are all old problems!" That's a bit biased, don't you think?
You said it yourself: "old problems" - this is a new camera with a never-before-seen on a camera viewfinder! You better do some serious evaluation before saying uneducated guesses...
nico · 688 weeks ago
GUEST · 688 weeks ago
O'RLY · 688 weeks ago
Joshi · 688 weeks ago
Craig L · 688 weeks ago
Heinz · 687 weeks ago
Fants · 687 weeks ago
Rene · 687 weeks ago
Here is one more for you all to consider: Sony NEX lenses are mediocre and there are only a few of them. Not everyone can afford to buy lenses costing $1000+ to get the quality that the camera is capable of.
Impressionable Mind · 687 weeks ago