Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: Gun Cameras, Camera Gun! (And Please Continue the K-0x Line, Pentax Ricoh!)

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Gun Cameras, Camera Gun! (And Please Continue the K-0x Line, Pentax Ricoh!)

Well, this is a gun camera:-



Source: http://www.photoblog.hk/wordpress/24662/

It was modified from a real gun by the Japanese traffic police back to 1954, the purpose of it was to shoot with one hand and steadily! Clever design, I have to say.

But then there was a real gun which looked like a camera by the CIA in 1966. Well, it was modified from an Asahi Pentax Reflex! Oh yes, it was the big glorious days of Pentax which Canon and Nikon only knew to follow!!



Source: http://www.aohc.it/oddse1.htm

Don't press the shutter release button of this "camera" too causally, it would really make a *killer* shot! :-o

Now, in 2012, what does the meaning of the first gun camera? Back to the 90s and early 2000s, there were such cannon/gun looking film and digital cameras:-


Above: Sony F717, 2002, Picture Source Here.


Above: Ricoh Mirai, 1988, Picture Source Here.


Above: Olympus AZ-4, 1989, Ricoh Mirai Twin, Picture Source Here.

And finally here is the Pentax Optio MX/MX4, of which I purchased my "MX" back to 2004. I must say its ergonomics is excellent and is very suitable for prolonged time video shooting. Whilst the user can hold very steadily for both video and still picture shooting, the camera can also be operated with one hand basically. Well, the Optio MXs had a flipped LCD with great freedom for its movement, which is really great!


Above: Pentax Optio MX, 2004, Pictures' Source Here

Now, it is heard that Pentax Ricoh is going to abort the K-01 line and is not developing it further. That is sad as they should make the K-01 in such form factor and design, which they should be able to do. That will surely hide the long flange distance of the K-mount and adding an EVF and include back a flipped monitor with a similar design of the MX', that will be a clear winner, I am almost certain!

We all know that the K-01 is by now the "best" video shooting Pentax body in the line. However, I do think that it is just not good enough. Change the form and shape of it, add also a stereo microphone! Then it could rival the Sony NEX VG900, even it is a Full Frame, just because this proposed Pentax mirrorless can be sold far cheaper for its much lower cost. Also, if there will be such a cannon K-02, all the R&D efforts paid by Hoya will not be wasted, and possibly it will form a new line of Pentax K-mount APS-C mirrorless that could finally succeed, as it is being unique in the market but yet have a great usability and being very practical to use!

Furthermore, they should buy the new NEX-5R 16M sensor from Sony, which will do PMAF on sensor to further enhance the AF performance, especially during video recording. The last time I tried, the CDAF of the K-01 was not that bad indeed. In fact, I am much impressed with the CDAF performance of the latest Pentax cameras which is better than any Canon DSLR and close to my NEX IMHO. And who says the K-01 CDAF is meaningless? I am sure that it is more accurate with all different K-mount lenses than all those Pentax DSLRs after all, the K-5II/s inclusive! The CDAF is WYSIWYG, what thing else can be more accurate?

Don't you guys agree with me this time?!


Read Also:-

Canon EOS-M is Around the Corner, How Pentax Could Compete with the K-0x?

A Not-so-common K-30/K-5/K-01 Comparison of Mine

Pack a Gun to Protect Camera Gear from Airline Theft or Loss!? (in USA Only)

A (Pentax) Camera Catalogue Collector

Comments (12)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I have the new Sony NEX-VG900 full frame camcorder pre-ordered that I will use with my K-mount lenses using low cost adapters. It has the best EVF made and could be angled unlike the A99 and no light loss with a mirror in it's light path.
I pulled the trigger on a K-01. It was $430 with the 40mmXS and two extra batteries. I agree that the AF performance is not that bad (low light it hunts, but in good light it is really quick). When you turn off SR in video mode, distortion was greatly reduced.
1 reply · active 648 weeks ago
That's a real bargain! I bought my 40XS for $200 back to April for the lens alone! But the bad thing is that it seems that Ricoh is trying very hard to get rid of the K-01 stock as soon as possible and it would be discontinued very soon, but without replacement!

As for SR is related to image distortion in videos, it is somehow rather mysterious. Could you find out more why's that?
Gabriel Fontes's avatar

Gabriel Fontes · 648 weeks ago

I agree with you. They should keep the K-01 line changing the design to something very different.
1 reply · active 648 weeks ago
I think they (I mean the PR) are not brave enough to invest more (so as to make something different), but rather opted to take a conservative approach to place "safe"! >:-(
I agree. I use live-view more and more on my K-x. It's great for studio/tripod photography (for critical focusing) and event photography (to shoot from high). The live-view AF is slooow. It's not a problem for tripod work using manual focus. But for moving subjects, it's a problem. I'm often thinking of buying a K-01, but the ergonomics are not so great for event photography, I can't imagine trying to operate it with a heavy flash-gun mounted on top. Even the K-x is not great with a flash gun attached. Maybe the K-30 is a better compromise? Anyways, I use optical viewfinder less and less. A K-02 with proper ergonomics would be great.
3 replies · active 647 weeks ago
I keep forgetting that the K-01 doesn't have wireless flash support, which is pretty handy for me in studio situations.
You need to get an add-on accessory for that purpose like those from Phottix then. Don't know if there is any Pentax P-TTL support, though.
Ya, I guess that would work, since P-TTL is so unreliable that I shoot in the studio with manual flash.
Fotosnaiper's avatar

Fotosnaiper · 648 weeks ago

No Fotosnaiper? I am disappointed.
1 reply · active 648 weeks ago
It is just a gun-pod, not a gun camera!
I love this idea! But I wouldn't want to use a camera resembling a gun in anyway around a local police officer.
In some parts of the USA this would be a nonstarter.

Post a new comment

Comments by