Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog

Monday, February 07, 2011

Canon Announced EOS 600D (Rebel T3i) and 1100D (Rebel T3)

The previous spread rumours on the net are true. The 600D (Rebel T3i) and 1100D (Rebel T3) are there!

http://forums.dpreview.com/news/1102/11020720canoneos600d.asp



(See the DPR hands-on preview here)

http://forums.dpreview.com/news/1102/11020719canoneos1100d.asp



(See the DPR hands-on preview here)

So, Canon strikes back again. This DSLR market and competition is really fierce! :-|

In order to compete, I am sure that Pentax/Hoya needs to make more colourful DSLRs in order to survive, just like the following stuff that has just been announced (locally at Japan) or to be announced (very soon, worldwide):-



But then this time Canon is also playing with colours, so? :-o



Source: http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/pview/20110208_424678.html

Official: http://cweb.canon.jp/camera/eosd/kissx50/face-design.html


Last Related:-


CP+ is Coming, Any Predictions/Rumours?

Summary of Reactions to Popular Online DSLR Reviews

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=37629901

A quick roundup :
  • First there will be the thread, even before anyone has read through the review, that says nothing else than "Hey, the review is online" : if everyone that wants to say that, does it in one thread, we will save a rainforest of identical threads.

  • Then there is the thread for those that actually read through the review and want to indicate small factual errors to the reviewers.

  • Then there is the thread for those that want to applaud DPR for a fair review.

  • Then there is the thread for those that want tot accuse DPR of bias.

  • A subthread can be started for the conspiracy-theories.

  • Then there is the thread for those questioning DPR's methodology in testing (subthreads for focus speed, focus accuracy, ISO pixel peeping etc).

  • Then there is the thread for those who want to complain about which cameras should be included in or excluded from comparative tests.

  • Then there is the thread for those that want to go into detail about Awards being awarded or not awarded (just).

  • Then there is the thread for those who want to debate whether the Pros from the conclusion sheet are really Pros, or whether the Cons are really Cons (including comparisons with other reviews, where the same item was listed otherwise).

  • Then there is the thread for those who want to excerpt a small snippet of the review (either a positive or a negative remark) and pull it out of context.

  • Then there is the thread for those who feel reinforced in their decision to buy an E-5 (of for having already done so).

  • Then there is the thread for those who feel reinforced in their decision to wait for a price drop.

  • Then there is the thread for those who feel reinforced in their decision not to buy an E5.

  • Then there is the thread for those who state that one should never look at a camera on its own, but at the whole system it is part of.

  • Then there is the thread for those who say the review of the individual camera is pointless because the system as a whole is dying/dead.

  • Then there is the thread for those who want to say they don't care.

  • And finally a thread for those who say that a picture says more than a thousand words.


Really Very NICE!~ :-D

Bits and Pieces News/Rumours (Feb. 7th)

1. Yet another new 645D review with bunch of full samples:-

http://www.reghardware.com/2011/02/04/review_camera_pentax_645d/



2. The new upcoming DFA 645 25 F4 lens:-

http://photorumors.com/2011/02/06/pentax-d-fa-645-25mm-f4-lens-price-revealed/



Btw, what are that knob and the dial used for? :-o

3. A K-5 mini-review with small samples:-

http://www.thephoblographer.com/2011/02/04/the-complete-pentax-k-5-review/



Do read the EXIF data that is preserved, you will be surprised! E.g., the low-light shot is at ISO 100 at 6s and stopped down to f/1o! :-o

4. A K-5 Vs D7000 high ISO quick shootout:-

http://www.thephoblographer.com/2011/02/04/iso-torture-test-pentax-k-5-vs-nikon-d7000-which-is-better-comparison/



5. Pentax has filed a patent for a "dividable" telephoto lens (into two pieces):-

http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2011-02-04#english



6. Hollow rumours about a Pentax Full Frame this fall and a budget/cutdown version of the 645D (via 1001 Noisy Cameras).

7. The world's ugliest camera!:-

http://www.petapixel.com/2011/02/04/bonnie-pink-model-pentax-k-r-becomes-worlds-ugliest-camera/



I have to agree, this is the ugliest camera we mankind have ever had! :-( It is just a hacked camera that is built up by different bits and pieces, of different random colours! >:-|

8. Nanoblock/Lego etc. is not the unique thing of Pentax. Now someone has made a Lego OVF for the NEX!:-

http://sonyalphanex.blogspot.com/2011/01/diy-lego-viewfinder-for-nex.html



So, no need for the OEM made finder and accessory? ;-)

Saturday, February 05, 2011

SAFOX IX Tungsten/Yellow Light Front Focus Issue Fully Investigated

Background

Since K-r and K-5 have been marketed, many Pentax users have been complaining about the obvious Front Focus (FF) issue resulted when using these cameras, when they were shooting at lower light and more so under tungsten light source, actually. A recent report here.

In fact, this "Yellow Light FF Symptom" was with Pentax users for long since Pentax made their first DSLR, the *ist D. But I did find that the problem was not as severe as before since Pentax had made the K-m and with the two successive models of the K-7 and K-x, too. But rather unfortunately, with the K-r, it seems that this issue strikes again and more of those adverse reports arose, which was also confirmed shortly after a few days use of my new K-r! :-(

So, I decided to do yet another controlled experiment, to compare the old SAFOX VII of my MZ-S, the SAFOX VIII (latest version) of my K-x and the SAFOX IX (first version) of the K-r:-



Test Methodology

1. The focus target is as below. It comprises of a stair case of 3 flat surfaces. The centre one is the main target, which has a good contrasty pattern, and is used for the AF, with the central single focus point of the cameras, in AF-S mode.



2. Each of the camera body is then mounted on a sturdy tripod. The light source is changed between Yellow and White, photos are taken and then where the final focus arrives in the final image per picture is observed. The lens focus/distance scale for the final focus measure is also recorded, for each picture.

3. The shutter release button is re-pressed for a few times until there is no re-focusing/hunting and that the camera believes firmly that its decided AF focus is correct.

4. Other testing notes and conditions: FA 43/1.9 Limited in Av mode at f/2.0, ISO 200, SR off, AF Single, Central AF point, AWB, latest firmware in K-r and last latest firmware in K-x.

The Results

Camera
Recorded Image
Lens' Distance
MZ-S / White Light Source
N/A

MZ-S / Yellow Light Source
N/A

K-x / White Light

K-x / Yellow Light
K-r (AF Fine Adj Off) / White Light
K-r (AF Fine Adj Off) / Yellow Light
K-r (AF Fine Adj On, at Max. Value of -10) / White Light

K-r (AF Fine Adj On, at Max. Value of -10) / Yellow Light

Observations and Conclusions

1. Both K-x and K-r (*without* focus adjust) are fairly accurate with white light source.

2. Under yellow light source, the K-x focus shifts forward and too with the K-r. But the span of the shift of the K-x is considerably less than that of the K-r. As a result, the K-x' picture is still somehow acceptable even it is front focused. On the other hand, the K-r picture under yellow light is totally out of focus for the target owing to the serious front focusing. This is verified from the lens' focus scale readings in the above the four respective pictures, too.

3. With focus adjust at -10 for the K-r, now it focuses more correctly under yellow light, but then it then causes obvious back focusing in white light. Again, the span between white and yellow light is large, although it is not as large as when the focus adjust is off.

4. The MZ-S / SAFOX VII is affected least by the yellow light with minimal effect. By looking at the focus scale, it matches well with the best focus pictures under white light for the K-x and K-r.

Afterall, how does that ten years old SAFOX VII still outperform both the last version of SAFOX VIII and now the latest SAFOX of IX (but which is now the worst!)? How come Pentax yet once again has sucked quality from the SAFOX IX, which they had already improved it to avoid the problem somehow with the latest revision of the SAFOX VIII?? :-o

And since I purchased the K-r to upgrade but not downgrade, its more serious yellow light FF symptom than the K-x really upset me. And this is for sure a big disappointment - I did not expect the K-r could be and should be worse than the K-x! >:-[

Remedials, then?

1. Use the LiveView to focus, the LV CDAF is not affected by the yellow light, last time I checked and verified. But with LV, of course it has its problem and limitations, such as no OVF could be used and the prolonged shutter lag (the shutter will be fired twice before a picture is taken).

2. Manually change the focus adjust setting each time for Yellow or White light source (do remember to set the memory function for the last accessed menu item to avoid more troubles if you do this! And do remember to check frequently to avoid "user error"!!).

But of course, the pre-requisite for you for doing this is that you must first have an accurate K-r in AF which requires no -ve focus adjust by default in the very beginning, just like mine. Otherwise, you will never be able to enter the required amount of (the -ve) correction if you have already used up some of the quota, just in case - which could happen with the "excellent" QC of Pentax nowadays.


Read Also:-

How AF Errors Can Decrease *Effective* Resolution?

Friday, February 04, 2011

Pentax Losing Momentum in Japan?

I'm afraid that the observation of this Pentaxian is right..

http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/130967-pentax-losing-momentum-japan.html

I have just checked, Pentax is still not doing well for the latest BCN ranking as in the last week of January:-

http://bcnranking.jp/category/subcategory_0008.html

Best Pentax result is the K-5 + DA 18-135 kit set, which is only ranked at No. 40. :-(

More "NC-1" (the Pentax Mirrorless) Rumours

First, Photo Rumors said to get an unverifiied pixelised small image of it:-


http://photorumors.com/2011/02/03/pentax-nc-1-mirrorless-camera/

And then, the Mirrorless Rumors write that it is a 5.6X cropped sensor camera with just a P&S DC sensor which is shared with Kenko for their upcoming mirrorless. The NC-1 will be announced in May with two interchangeable lens..

http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/pentax-mirrorless-system-with-ultratiny-sensor-5x/

Of course, a new lens mount will be used. It is just impossible to use even the old Auto 110 mount which is too ancient and has no modern feature of any, neither even an auto aperture.



Anyway, if it is true, just don't have any expectation about the IQ of the new Pentax mirrorless. It is just an interchangeable lens P&S "system" after all! :-(

But I just wish to ask, why not buy a prosumer/superzoom DC then?? Are changing lens and getting dust on sensor just having so much fun?? :-o

Tuesday, February 01, 2011

Very Wild Rumours: Pentax K-2 and New Body Announcement on Feb. 8th



See this:-

http://cgi.ebay.ca/New-Battery-PENTAX-D-LI109-DLI109-K-R-K-2-KR-K2-SLR-/360333677532?pt=Batteries_Chargers&hash=item53e58f93dc

via Xitek Forum Here (Simplified Chinese, machine-translated English Page Here).

It is also said that there will soon be an announcement for a new Pentax DSLR or even EVIL(ILDC) on February 8th, which from my best sensible guess, should be the K-5 Silver but not anything else, if the rumour is to be true.

After all, remember these are rumours. And they are very wild ones.

Update: K-2 should not exist, K-2 is simply K-r in Mandarin!

Important K-7 Debug Mode Activation Note

Is that the user should open the SD card door instead of closing it! Otherwise, it won't work:

http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=986059&extra=page%3D1
(Traditional Chinese, machine-translated English page here)

So, someone may point out and would ask (as already in the above thread), the K-7/5 have the focus correction function built-in already, from -10 to +10, why bother then? The reason as answered by two different K-7 users in the above thread is that, "It is just not enough, the error is just more than that and beyond!" :-o :-(

As for my new K-r, I now face the same situation. The lucky thing is that my K-r's AF is reasonably accurate under sunlight and white light source, but when under tungsten, even a -10 correction factor is not enough but yet I don't know how to enter the Debug mode for the K-r! Really too bad!! >:-{

Btw and in fact, my K-x suffers less from the "Yellow Light Symptom" than the K-r. I shall show you folks why and how with a simple experiment together with some illustrations later on when I have the time! Stay tuned!


Related:-

http://www.google.com/search?q=Debug+Mode&btnG=Find&domains=ricehigh.blogspot.com&sitesearch=ricehigh.blogspot.com


AF Accuracy's Dependency on Lenses and Yellow Light

K-5 Low Light Front Focusing Issue - The SAFOX *Plus* System Simply Does NOT Work at all!

Is the AF Accuracy of Pentax K-5/K-r Really So Bad?

Inside the Nikon D7000: The K-5 Sensor is There! ;-)

The Sony IMX071:-



From: http://www.chipworks.com/en/technical-competitive-analysis/resources/recent-teardowns/2011/01/teardown-of-the-nikon-d7000-dslr/

Quoted:-

"Sony IMX071

The Nikon D7000 comes equipped with a DX format (APS-C) sensor fabricated by Sony, the IMX071. With a 16.2 Mp resolution, this is the second highest resolution of any Nikon DSLR, behind the 24 Mp D3X (dpreview.com). This image sensor features a pixel size of 4.8 µm x 4.8 µm (as seen in the Bayer patterned RGB color filters). The sensor displays improvements in pixel layout and process features, as compared to previous generations of Sony DSLR sensors."


Read Also:-

The Secrets of the K10D (Part 1 of 3) - The Heart: The CCD

The Secrets of the K10D (Part 2 of 3) - The Bridge: The ADC

The Secrets of the K10D (Part 3 of 3) – The Brain: The IPU

Repair a Stuck SDM DIY - An English Guide



After reading my last article about the big discovery of DIY SDM repairing, our Blog reader "sveinmb" has compiled a full repair guide in English, after he successfully repaired a stuck SDM himself, here it is:-

http://bangmedia.no/pentax/sdmfix/

What I have to say is that the guide is clear and appropriately detailed. Nice done, Sveinmb!