Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: Special K-5II Exhibits at Photokina

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Special K-5II Exhibits at Photokina

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1036&thread=42558367





Note that the weather sealings that are red dyed. In addition to the transparent unit, there is also a cut-out exhibit of a standard K-5II, too.
Time (UTC +0800):
標籤： , ,

Comments (19)

Loading... Logging you in...
Dashboard | Edit profile | Logout
  • Logged in as
-2 Vote up Vote down
Toomas Kadarpik's avatar

Toomas Kadarpik · 686 weeks ago

With current state of the art sensor technology APC camera has no point, we just need more Nikon/Canon/Sony cameras. Pentax was sold to RICOH for pennies, this means they had completely different idea in mind, may be dozen patents they got or something we do not know. Better AF and lack of AA filter pushes me to upgrade my K5. The basic problem is lack of ecosystem around Pentax cameras.
9 replies · active 685 weeks ago
+1 Vote up Vote down
jaad75's avatar

jaad75 · 686 weeks ago

I have a great ecosystem for those cameras right in my photo bag...:P
0 Vote up Vote down
Alex's avatar

Alex · 686 weeks ago

Who are those "we"? Because *I* know - even the publicly available information is enough to be certain Pentax Ricoh mean business. Imaging Business :p

P.S. With the current state of the art sensor technology bigger than APS-C cameras has no point, for most photographers.
Loading...
+1 Vote up Vote down
RiceHigh's avatar - Go to profile

RiceHigh 110p · 686 weeks ago

If you still want to defend, the Q is enough for most average users including you and me, as a "photographer" who uses it as a "photographic tool"!
0 Vote up Vote down
Alex's avatar

Alex · 686 weeks ago

It's definitely enough for you :p
Loading...
0 Vote up Vote down
RiceHigh's avatar - Go to profile

RiceHigh 110p · 686 weeks ago

The Q is not enough for you because you're not a photographer, but just a pixel peeper, who knows to complain only!
+2 Vote up Vote down
Alex's avatar

Alex · 686 weeks ago

Ricey, are you sure you aren't talking about yourself?
pixel peeper, check
knows to complain only, absolutely.
Yep, that's you - but guess what, other people are different.
+1 Vote up Vote down
zosX's avatar

zosX · 686 weeks ago

I scoffed at the q, but now, I want one. It offers so many possibilities! As a street cam it would be rather hard to beat.
0 Vote up Vote down
Fred's avatar

Fred · 685 weeks ago

I can see myself getting one once they incorporate focus peaking. I'd use it as a handy teleconverter.
Loading...
+1 Vote up Vote down
RiceHigh's avatar - Go to profile

RiceHigh 110p · 685 weeks ago

Does the new Q10 feature focus peaking? Nope?
-2 Vote up Vote down
rjsd's avatar

rjsd · 686 weeks ago

Can you say Corn-beef and rehash. Another money loser for Pentax
3 replies · active 686 weeks ago
+1 Vote up Vote down
zosX's avatar

zosX · 686 weeks ago

Taking the best camera body in the world and best aps-c sensor and fixing some of the problems (low light AF, easily scratched, hard to see screen....) as well as offering an AA filterless version is not all that bad. How long has canon been milking the 7d and its noisy sensor now? What would have been better in your opinion? A downgrade to the noisy sony 24mp sensor? I don't see any reason to upgrade the k-5 asides from M processor improvements like focus peaking. You can have video AF. I'd much rather use MF to avoid noise.
-2 Vote up Vote down
rjsd's avatar

rjsd · 686 weeks ago

The sequel is never as good as the original. I still think it is another money loser for Pentax. The Question is how does Pentax attarck new customers after a continual loss over two or three decades? Is it possible? What other washed up camera company has been able to make a come back? Kodak??? Time to move along folks, nothing to see here. O consider Pentax to be more collectables or antiques but no longer a viable camera company.
-1 Vote up Vote down
rjsd's avatar

rjsd · 686 weeks ago

find my spellin errors and win a prize!
0 Vote up Vote down
rjsd's avatar

rjsd · 686 weeks ago

I just heard that Pentax was two more DLSR's in the pipe line the K5III and K5IV-2. LOL. I heard this from a reliable source over at PF. Maybe pentax will get into web-cams....
1 reply · active 686 weeks ago
+2 Vote up Vote down
Walt's avatar

Walt · 686 weeks ago

So clever. Wow you must have spent a bit of time thinking throught that tired one.
0 Vote up Vote down
LAM's avatar

LAM · 686 weeks ago

From cut-out model, it's clear that it's not possible to fit the full frame sensor with SR system in K5 body. I guess you have to wait for years for Pentax-Ricoh to develop FF dslr alone then. Or perhaps slow down the R&D on new DA/Q lens, processing unit, and anything else to put effort solely in FF may be you could have FF dslr next year.
-2 Vote up Vote down
rjsd's avatar

rjsd · 686 weeks ago

Buying Pentax is like buying a car from GM the company will not be here in ten years. GM still has the same union problems that cuased the trouble in the first place. Pentax can't seem to develop or produce a viable product that will ijncrease it's customer base. Both companies are doomed to go the way of Kodak.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)