Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog

Wednesday, November 09, 2011

More Trouble Reports (of GXR A12, D700 and D300S)



1. Supply shortage of Ricoh GXR A12 modules owing to shortage of manufacturing component parts that are made in and supplied from Thailand:-

http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20111108_489328.html
(in Japanese, Google translation to English Here)

2. Discontinuation of Nikon D700 and D300S in Japan homeland, owing to the non-conformance to the latest legal product safety regulations published and enforced. No replacement models are available in the meantime! :-o

http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20111108_489260.html
(in Japanese, Google translation to English Here)

Well, the impact of the Thailand flooding to the camera industry is really huge. I bet the D700 and 300s replacements should have come, but the flooding has delayed the launch of them. Otherwise, I don't believe Nikon would have such poor planning in product succession, and let two models discontinued without any replacement to them at their own country, especially considering that the D700 is the only "affordable" FF model of Nikon.

New Lithium Rechargable Battery Type in AA Format - LiFePO4

Thanks to Blog reader Hayami, I've got known to this "new" battery type and product.

This new rechargeable Lithium technology is different from the conventional Lithium-ion or polymer ones, the native voltage is at about 3.45V and with a nominal rated voltage at 3.2V after some use. This voltage is actually very close to the added up voltage of two fresh disposable AA alkaline or lithium batteries. It is called the Lithium Iron Phosphate, or LiFePO4 in chemical term:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_iron_phosphate


(Source: Chinese ZOL Forum)

As we can see from the above Wiki article, LiFePO4 does have many advantages over the other conventional Lithium rechargeable technologies. Yet, it shares the advantages of other lithium rechargeables such as no memory effect and a very low self-discharge rate.

Unlike the conventional Lithium rechargeables, no external voltage regulation is required to match the "1.5V" (x2) voltage requirement, which makes now it is possible to make AA sized battery in which including such a voltage regulation circuitry is almost impractical.

As for the internal resistance of the LiFePO4, it is less than 100 mOhm as specified, which is close to the rated 90 to 150 mOhm of the Energizer disposable AA Lithium L91. But however, since we use four ("1.5V") L91 in our Pentax AA DSLRs whilst only two are needed for the LiFePO4 (with two other dummy battery conductors to be inserted in series and used in conjunction), the total battery internal resistance is halved in comparison, as a result. This is considered still much relatively safer to use the NiZn rechargeable AA as its internal resistance is only at about 5 mOhm per battery unit only, which is considered just too low and too dangerous, as it might cause damage to device depending on the design of its circuitry.

And, here is an article which shows the inside of a charger product that is widely available at Taobao (aka the Chinese e-Bay). It seems that the charger is well made with good materials used and workmanship. The charger is manufactured by a Hong Kong vendor with factory in the mainland China btw.



The LiFePO4 charger is also available in USB format, by a different Chinese manufacturer, though:-


(Source: http://www.qqid.com/jk/shop_view.asp?id=158)

Nevertheless, one of the least drawbacks of the current LiFePO4 AA in the market is about its lower rated capacity in mAh, which is at 600 only. But with its superior voltage regulation throughout its whole discharge curve, it has been widely reported that the battery performance and life is still superior than all those NiMH rechargeables which are rated at 2,000mAH+ something, for most cases. Below is one set of the tested discharge characteristics for two different samples as posted:-


(Credit: http://www.920pk.com/shangpin_7291871215.htm)

After all, my set of 4 LiFePO4 AA batteries (with 4 dummy AA conductors) will arrive very soon. I will test it more thoroughly this week and shall write an user report/review of mine later on. But as you can see in all the above Chinese web-links, most of the user comments are very favourable and positive, with various different kinds of devices used, including DSLRs, DCs, torches and RC toys. Besides using that in my K-x, I am eager to try that in my Tayami QuickDrive (QD) toy racing car and see how faster my car could get with the increased power but yet far less weight that put inside for the batteries! :-D


Related:-

K-x Battery Issue Re-visited (with the Latest Firmware)

Better K-x Rechargable Solution? Is the NiZn Safe?

AA Battery Chargers Fully Compared (4 Models)

Overclocking Your Pentax (AA Battery) DSLR(s)!?

Six Years of AA Battery Pentax DSLRs

When 1100mAh Li-ion RCR-V3s Outperform 2500mAh+ NiMH AAs ..

TechRadar Pentax Q Full Review



http://www.techradar.com/reviews/cameras-and-camcorders/cameras/digital-slrs-hybrids/pentax-q-1005997/review

Bundle of sample pictures, real-world or not and including this ISO set, are available in full size and being un-retouched.

A good and detailed review after all. But I am afraid that whilst the P-Q's higher ISO performance at 400 to 800 seems to be acceptable, all the images viewed at pixel level are still, SOFT, no matter how and for what! :-(

N.B. Most of the test pictures were made with the "01" kit prime.

Cable Control Your (Pentax) DSLRs Using iPhone


(Credit: DC Fever)

Using the ioShutter.

Now, if your Pentax DSLR has a cable release socket, then you can use your iPhone to fire the shutter remotely but wired, and with even more software control capabilities including interval shooting, programmable bulb and sound/movement trigger etc. A nice and welcome Pentax alternative of course. And with many people are having iPhones nowadays, it could come in handy, provided that the user also brings along with the proprietary interfacing release cable that is to be purchased from the ioShutter altogether with the App.


Related:-

Remote Control Your Camera Using Android Device

The Pentax (Electronic) Cable Switches

New Olympus Patent for a Reflective Image Sensor (to do Phase-detect AF and make the OVF)



http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2011-11-09

(in Japanese, Google-translated English Page Here)

The principle is to make the sensor reflective so that a portion of the light is reflective upward to the phase-detection AF module and then to the OVF (which is switchable to an EVF as desired). This patent is interesting enough and can overcome the two utmost shortcomings of the current ILDC design. But however, I still have doubts about if IQ would be affected, and even more so if Olympus can survive and pass through the current big crisis of their gate case! :-o




Read Also:-


Pentax' New Patent on "Ghostless" Sensor (Surface)

Live View & AF Methods Fully Dissected

Tuesday, November 08, 2011

Olympus is on Verge of Bankruptcy!?



See what EOS HD has reported today, I'm afraid that Olympus is really in deep trouble water!

Some key quotes:-

"Shares in Olympus fell 70% on the news a few hours ago and could be de-listed from the Tokyo stock exchange. “Under Japanese exchange rules, companies found to have falsified earnings reports could be removed from trading.”"


(Credit: Yahoo Japan)


"The precedent set by Japanese firms that have done the same thing – dubbed ‘tobashi’ in Japan – is not good. Namely, criminal conviction and bankruptcy followed suit."

"With Olympus having lost 70% of its value and facing a massive ethical backlash, as well as huge damage to its once respected brand there are dark times ahead for the company especially the camera division which is already loss making even by Olympus’s accounting practices! It is speculated the camera company could be spun off but in my view there are a lack of possible candidates."


Too bad.. I bet before October, nobody knew that the development of this "gate" case would be running into now this seemly to be a dead end! (Sigh! My first DC was an Olympus!)

Kokak Announced New CCD FF and APS-H Sensors, Seeking Patents



See what the Image Sensors World reports lately:-

http://image-sensors-world.blogspot.com/2011/11/kodak-announces-new-ccds-seeks-patents.html

So, there is new choice for a 135 FF sensor. As usual, although almost completely desperate, I hope with one more choice, a new Pentax FF DSLR is still imagined! >:-(

Besides, but quite possibly, these large size CCD imagers usually do not support contemporary video recording modes. But anyway, if it delivers the format and (or even better?) image quality of a FF sensor, why not? I shall surely be willing to sacrifice the video mode for solely still photos, especially if the FF dream in Pentaxland could really come some days later, no matter how late it would be! :-o By that time, if it really happens, all the superb and excellent old Pentax 135 K-mount lenses will be liberated and Pentax will revive!!


Last Related:-

Kodak has Sold its Image Sensor Business

K-r to be Discontinued Very Soon?

See this Japanese user's report:-

http://bbs.kakaku.com/bbs/K0000150297/SortID=13734206/

(in Japanese, English here (machine-translated))

It is reported that the user/OP called the local Pentax Japan customer service hotline, it was informed that all the standard colour K-r and kits (black, white and pink colours) have been discontinued but only custom colour orders are accepted for both the body and lens(es). He was further annoyed with the vague reply and statement that those custom orders could "still be accepted" in the meantime, which in his opinion is rather unclear and confusing!

It seems that there are something in chaos within Pentax/Ricoh (internally) for the time being, as it is very clear that K-r replacement is by no means come near nor there is any rumour/news for that (but only for the K-5, sort of). So, without any new K-r replacement, how could and should Pentax Japan told their customers that the K-r and kits are no long available? And, the strangest thing is even that unavailability only applies to standard (coloured) items, but not non-standard ones!? >:-o

Kodak has Sold its Image Sensor Business

http://www.kodak.com/ek/US/en/Kodak_Sells_Image_Sensor_Business_to_Platinum_Equity.htm

But the new acquirer, I am afraid, might be just transitional. It is because it is just a financial firm, but not a technical firm in the field and industry:-

"Platinum Equity focuses on acquiring businesses that can benefit from the firm’s extensive in-house capability and expertise in transition, integration and operations."

So, eventually, which owner would the PE company eventually sells the Kodak ISS to? Time will tell.. In the meantime, it seems that Pentax would still be able to get the 645D sensor from the PE, after its takeover.

This Kodak ISS sales makes me feel very fortunately that Pentax has been finally sold to Ricoh, whom is at least a technical firm and that they are quite keen in making cameras. I think a pure financial firm won't run a technical firm well in long run, non they would have the real interest in doing so.


Last Related:-

Kodak on Verge of Bankruptcy?

Monday, November 07, 2011

A (Pentax) Camera Catalogue Collector

Who? It's Me! :-D



Indeed, the above is only a very partial set of items in my collected camera catalogue archives. In the old days, printed catalogue was the most effective official means to provide product information and to promote products. But anyway, those were the days. With the rise of the Internet, nowadays, catalogues are almost "useless" than they were. Even if they exist, we mostly read them in pdf form or etc.

P.S. A "group" photo of my Ricoh catalogues may come.


Related:-

What Will be My 10th/Next DSLR/ILDC Body?

Hotax Has NOW Been Rictax! ;-D