Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: DA 16-45 Vs DA*16-50 Head-to-head Shootout

Monday, October 24, 2011

DA 16-45 Vs DA*16-50 Head-to-head Shootout

See this useful test, side-by-side and head-to-head for the two lenses:-

http://www.pentaxuser.co.uk/news/pentax-16-45mm-and-16-50mm-compared-169

via Michael A. (Blog reader)

As we can easily see, optically the DA*16-50 does perform better than the DA 16-45, especially at wide opened and at the wide end and at the image corners:-

Pentax 16-45mm at 16mm and f/4 - sharpness test Pentax 16-50mm at 16mm and f/2.8 - sharpness test
Pentax 16-45mm at 16mm and f/4 Pentax 16-50mm at 16mm and f/2.8

However, the tester does not like the bulkiness and expensiveness of the DA* lens:-



The close-up ability of the DA 16-45 is yet better:-

Pentax 16-45mm macro Pentax 16-50mm macro
16-45mm closest focus 16-50mm closest focus

As for the distortions, both are somehow obvious at 16mm, but the DA 16-45 does perform slightly better, yet:-

Pentax 16-45mm distortion test at 16mm Pentax 16-50mm distortion test at 16mm
Pentax 16-45mm distortion test at 16mm Pentax 16-50mm distortion test at 16mm

Last but not least, I would like to add that the other main disadvantage of the DA*16-50 is about its SDM. I am sure that the DA*16-50 is the most widely reported Pentax DA* model with the SDM issue. So, after all, I gave up to get it long time ago, although it might be optically better than the DA 16-45 resolutional wise.

Comments (5)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Yes, the DA 16-45 is probably still best value lens in Pentax line-up..
Michael A.'s avatar

Michael A. · 700 weeks ago

16-45 doesn't vignette as much (hence f4), has QS as well, good for vid, and covers FF from 22-45. Reverse zoom is neat too, so again, great value... Thanks RH for refreshing this useful older post from www.pentaxuser.co.uk folks!
1 reply · active 699 weeks ago
Michael, you're the one whom I should thank for providing the link instead! :-)
bandymelis's avatar

bandymelis · 699 weeks ago

The 16-50 does not perform as good as 16-45 at the 50 mm 2.8 setting (although will probably be better by stopping down to 4). Well, for 50 mm I would rather use my dear FA 50/2.8 Macro, which has no rivals.
1 reply · active 698 weeks ago
starbase218's avatar

starbase218 · 698 weeks ago

I didn't know the 16-45 could be used at 50mm and f/2.8. My copy must have been faulty.

Post a new comment

Comments by