Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: K-5 Vs Canon 5D Vs 5D2 Vs 7D Dynamic Range Test and Measurement

Monday, October 24, 2011

K-5 Vs Canon 5D Vs 5D2 Vs 7D Dynamic Range Test and Measurement

Came across this earlier DR test of K-5 which also compares the DR of a 5D, 5D2 and 7D:-

http://www.guillermoluijk.com/tutorial/noisedr/

(Spanish, Google-translated English Page Here)

via http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=37056118

So, in short we have:-



And the dynamic range summary, by setting a 12 dB signal-to-noise ratio as the threshold limit:-



As we can see from the above, at the lowest ISO, K-5 has about 2EV more DR than the others. Do note that the advantage for the "dark" side only, but not for the highlights. That means that K-5 is able to keep about the same shadow noise level and maintain the SNR at -2 EVs more. Moreover, this advantage diminishes as ISO goes up, just say at ISO 1600, the 5D2 has 1 extra stop of DR than the K-5.

Comments (3)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Toomas Kadarpik's avatar

Toomas Kadarpik · 700 weeks ago

Yes 5D Mark II lacks ability to shoot in harsh sunlight and restore shadow areas as well as situation where part of the room is well lighted form window and you can not use artificial light. 5DII wins in SNR if at highlight area, this is much much better even if we compare iso 100, K5 is always nosy. high iso SNR is much better in 5D if properly exposure to the right dynamic range.
For this reason 5D is not very good HDR multishot camera either, because you can not bracket too widely e.g two stops.
But 5D does best photos in most of the situations.
bandymelis's avatar

bandymelis · 699 weeks ago

Now I do not understand why in the lower it says 5D Mark II has 8 at 1600, whereas in the upper diagram I can only count 6.5? The K5 curve is to the darker side, but its RANGE seems to be same or larger.
1 reply · active 699 weeks ago
I guess the plot is not complete, same case as for K-5's.

Post a new comment

Comments by