
See the official specs as published at the DPR:-
http://www.dpreview.com/products/canon/slrs/canon_eos6d
Is that 11-point AF with central f/2.8 sensor borrowed from our Pentax flagship K-5II? ;-D
Btw, if the 6D is compared to the specs of the K-5II, the weight difference is only by 10g, but don't forget the 6D is a Full Frame camera and that it has the GPS and WiFi functions built-in. Unlike the K-5II/s, there is no need to add on a GPS module, i.e., the O-GPS1. And the K-5II bodies could never support WiFi of course.
Update: DPR has published a preview of the 6D.
Alex · 651 weeks ago
OGL · 651 weeks ago
IIIIII · 651 weeks ago
VladimirYo · 651 weeks ago
Steve Green · 651 weeks ago
Anonymous · 651 weeks ago
andymuns@gmail.com · 651 weeks ago
andrew munster · 651 weeks ago
loock · 651 weeks ago
If Pentax give us FF35, a top high end DSLR camera,
0,9X viefinder magnification, ( I can accept 0,8 X + O-ME53 on top, for a final 0,94X, if the pentaprism and eye point are big enough ),
fast a trusty AF, reliable body, decent size ( front grip and SR on the back, make camera way to bulky; I don't need SR or huge front grip..)
etc., etc.,
then I can happily use Pentax again, enjoying SMC - infinitely better then Canon coatings, a good viewfinder, a decent size, decent design and ergonomics, a decent bokeh ( screw Nikkor...), and so on....
andymuns · 651 weeks ago
aDDDD · 651 weeks ago
andymuns · 651 weeks ago
zosX · 651 weeks ago
pWong · 651 weeks ago
Mike Lambert · 651 weeks ago
xsaper · 651 weeks ago
Guest · 651 weeks ago
Jaz Johal · 651 weeks ago
gool · 651 weeks ago
Here is another comparison that may be helpful: http://dslrpassion.com/reviews/60-equipment/498-c...